Butterworth filter via Cauer topology

  • Thread starter Frank-95
  • Start date
Hi all.

I would like to ask some explanation regarding how to obtain L and C values for a butterworth filter using the first Cauer topology. I will consider a normalized low pass filter.

(Link added by Mentor)

What I don't understand is this: how to pass from transfer function to L and C values?

For example: let's consider a second order filter, with 0 dB gain at DC (for simplicity). I have:

|H(jω)|2 = 1 / [1 + (ω/ωc)2n] ⇒ H(s)H(-s) = 1 /[1 + (-s2c2)n]

We find poles by putting the deniminator equal to 0. Hence it yields:

sk = jωcej(2k - 1)π/(2n)

For n = 2 and k = 1, 2

s1 = jωcejπ/4
s2 = jωcej3π/4

I thus have:

H(s) = ωc / [(s - s1) (s - s2)]

As shown also on wikipedia.

What I don't understand now is this: how can I calculate from here the values of capacitors and inductors of the LC ladder. There are formulas at wikipedia but they don't explain how they are obtained.

Any tip?

Thank you
Last edited by a moderator:


For a second order filter it is realtively easy: You find the transfer function H1(s) of the circuit (expresssed in terms of L and C) and - in a second step - you compare the corresponding parts of thhis function with the general second-order function Ho(s) (expressed in pole data Qp and wp). For a Butterworth filter we have Qp=0.7071 and wp=wc (desired 3dB frequency).
However, for filter orders n>2 this calculation is increasingly involved and you can (must) use corresponding tables with normalized element values (filter tables are available in corresponding filter books).
Okay, but I notice an analogy between:

sk = jωcej(2k - 1)π/(2n)


gk = 2sin((2k - 1)π/(2n))

In fact, if I develop the first equation I get:

sk = -sin[(2k - 1)π/(2n)] + jcos[(2k - 1)π/(2n)]

The normalized models I am referring about is this (R1 = R2):

So I feel pretty close to understand how normalized values are achieved, without using tables


You have shown how to find the poles of a Butterworth response - expressed in polar coordinates.
However, does it help you to find the corresponding parts values?
From the pole positions, you could, of course, derive the pole data for each complex pole pair (wp and Qp).
However, these values can be found in each book dealing with filters
Last edited:

Want to reply to this thread?

"Butterworth filter via Cauer topology" You must log in or register to reply here.

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads