C-Parity Oddity of Magnetic Current in SU(2) Yang-Mills Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leonid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qcd Yang-mills
Leonid
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Why a magnetic current obviously must be C-
parity odd in the (exact) SU(2) theory? (C^{-1} J_M C=-J_M).
Best regard. Leonid
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Leonid said:
Why a magnetic current obviously must be C-
parity odd in the (exact) SU(2) theory? (C^{-1} J_M C=-J_M).
Best regard. Leonid

Just a wild guess as a source for further discussion:

1) the magnetic current is a pseudovector since it is the curl of the dual SU(2) field tensor
2) thus it changes sign under PT
3) due to CPT invariance it also changes sign under C

Don't know if this is correct.
 
It also follows from the generalized Maxwell's equations with magnetic monopoles. Gauss's law reads \nabla\cdot\vec{E}=\rho. Under C, charge changes sign and since derivatives don't care about C, it must be that \vec{E} also changes sign. Applying this rule to the generalized Faraday law \nabla\times\vec{E}=J_M + \ldots, it must be that the magnetic current is also odd if C is a good symmetry.
 
Hi:

I have heard that in QCD, there is something called the beta function, How is that function usefull and does that have to do with the asymptotic freedom of quarks?
 
ghery said:
Hi:

I have heard that in QCD, there is something called the beta function, How is that function usefull and does that have to do with the asymptotic freedom of quarks?

In any interacting quantum field theory, there is a beta function - this is the function that explains how a coupling constant varies with the energy you measure it.

For example: consider the electric charge of an electron. It turns out that this number depends on the energy you are probing the electron with. The reason in that in quantum field theory, you can make particle-antiparticle pairs and this has the effect of "screening" the charge. As you probe at higher and higher energies (shorter and shorter distances) you are able to cut through more of that "quantum interference" and so the measured charge increases. The beta function is a way of quantifying that idea.

Now on to QCD: it turns out (due to the nature of nonabelian gauge theories) that QCD has the opposite effect - it has ANTI-screening. So as you probe at higher and higher energies (smaller and smaller distances) the measured charge actually DEcreases! This is the phenomenon known as "asymptotic freedom."

As to how it's useful: it is absolutely VITAL! You cannot do QCD computations without it (and get the right answer!).

Hope that helps!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top