Cal Poly for Aerospace Engineering?

AI Thread Summary
Cal Poly schools are recognized for their "learn by doing" philosophy, which enhances job recruitment but may not align with those aiming for a Ph.D. Aspiring Aerospace Engineers are considering whether to work in industry before pursuing further education, weighing financial implications and career goals. While Cal Poly Pomona is noted for its proximity to industry in Southern California, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo (SLO) is seen as more prestigious with better campus life. The engineering programs at Cal Poly are competitive with UC schools, though the UC system carries more overall prestige. Ultimately, Cal Poly is viewed as a strong, affordable option for engineering students.
CSpence
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I'm an aspiring Aerospace Engineer and I'd like some advice on what you guys think about the Cal Poly schools. I really like their "learn by doing" philosophy because it's great for immediate job recruitment, but not necessarily good for those who want to pursue a Ph.D. I want to acquire a Ph.D, but if I can get a job right after graduating then I'd rather take that course. My first question, do you guys think it's a good idea to work in industry for a few years then go back to school for a Ph.D? It'll be a tough transition financially, especially if I get raises during my initial career. Cal Poly also offers this program where you can get a Masters in about a year after your bachelors. Would that be a better option? My ideal company to work for would be SpaceX and I also have dreams of creating my own space company one day, if that makes any difference. The founder of SpaceX doesn't have a Ph.D.

What do you guys think of the Cal Poly schools overall? Which one is better for job recruitment? I've heard that Pomona is better for Engineering because it's closer to a lot of the industry in SoCal. But SLO definitely has the better campus life and area.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Cal Poly schools are definitely good. I'm not sure which one is better for job recruitment, but SLO seems to be a little more competitive and prestigious. But I've heard good things about Pomona engineering, and I know very successful people who went to Pomona, so it probably won't matter a whole lot. And like you, I think SLO is in a better area.

I just don't think you can really decide yet on whether you want to do a masters or phd, you should just wait and see how you feel when the time comes. I personally don't really like the idea of working for a few years and then going back to school, I would just want to get it all over with in one shot. But's that not to say it isn't possible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nice find Punkyc7. I think most of the "what can I do with a degree in x?" would be mitigated if every school had a detailed survey of their alumni doings.
 
Yeah I saw that before. I just wonder what the total amount of Aerospace graduates were in a given year, compared to the total amount who actually got employed.

Versus other UC's like UCLA, UCSB, & UCSD, how do you think Cal Poly stands? I didn't include Berkeley because they don't offer an Aerospace program.
 
The Cal Poly engineering program is probably on par with those other schools. Although, the UC system has a bit more of a prestigious name compared to the Cal State system. Cal Poly is focused on science and engineering, while UCLA is near the top in many other fields as well (the arts, medicine), which could contribute to its prestige. But if you are only concerned about engineering, Cal Poly is a great choice and is much more affordable than a UC.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Back
Top