Calculate acceleration after getting the Gravitational force between two bodies

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the acceleration of two objects due to gravitational force, use Newton's second law, F = ma, where F is the gravitational force and m is the mass of the object. Given a gravitational force of 80 N, the acceleration can be determined by rearranging the formula to a = F/m. The discussion highlights the initial confusion about how to compute acceleration, which is resolved by recognizing the application of this formula. The user expresses relief at realizing the solution is straightforward. This approach effectively allows for programming the simulation of gravitational attraction between two bodies.
MinusNick
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Say the gravitational force between two points is 80 N. The two points start off stationary. What do I do to find how those two objects would accelerate closer together? I'm trying to write a simple program that calculates the gravitational force between two objects and pulls them together, but I don't know how to do the latter. Could anyone be of assistance? A simple formula is probably all this requires... I hope!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I'll just plug in the force and mass into F = ma. I can't believe I didn't get that lol.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top