MHB Calculate Buoyant Force of 2.00L Helium Balloon

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the buoyant force on a 2.00 L helium balloon, apply Archimedes' principle, which states that the buoyant force equals the weight of the fluid displaced. The buoyant force can be expressed as B = ρ_fluid * V_fluid * g, where ρ_fluid is the density of the fluid (air), V_fluid is the volume of the balloon, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. To find the mass of the air displaced, use m = ρ * V, where ρ is the density of air and V is the volume of the balloon. The calculation ultimately leads to determining the weight of the 2.00 L of air to find the buoyant force acting on the helium balloon. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately calculating buoyant forces in fluid dynamics.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Calculate the buoyant force (in N) on a 2.00 L helium balloon.

Work:

Upward is Buoyant
Downward is weight due to gravity

$$\Sigma F=0$$
$B-mg=0$
$B=mg$
$\rho=m/V$
$m=\rho*V$
$B=\rho_{fluid}*V_{fluid}*g$

I am stuck on $m=\rho*V$. Am I missing something?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would use:

[box=blue]
Archimedes' principle
Any object, wholly or partially immersed in a fluid, is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object.[/box]

So, you need only find the weight of 2.00 L of air. :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top