Calculate Interference in thin films

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 5K views
samdiah
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the minimum thickness of a layer of manesium flouride(n=1.38) on flint glass (n=1.66) in a lens system, if light wavelength 5.50x10^2 nm in air undergoes destructive interference.

Given:
n1=1.38
n2=1.66
λ1=5.5*10^2 nm

Homework Equations



Δx=L(λ/2t)
n2/n1 = λ1/λ2


The Attempt at a Solution



Destructive interference is at λ/4, 3λ/4, 5λ/4 ...

So the λ in flint flass is λ2=(n1*λ)/n2
= 4.57 * 10^-7

Therefore the shortest thicknss should be λ/4
4.57*10^-7/4
1.14*10^-7

The answer however is wrong the answer is suppose to be 199 nm.

Can someone please help! Thanku
:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
samdiah said:

Homework Statement



Calculate the minimum thickness of a layer of manesium flouride(n=1.38) on flint glass (n=1.66) in a lens system, if light wavelength 5.50x10^2 nm in air undergoes destructive interference.

Given:
n1=1.38
n2=1.66
λ1=5.5*10^2 nm

Homework Equations



Δx=L(λ/2t)
n2/n1 = λ1/λ2

The Attempt at a Solution



Destructive interference is at λ/4, 3λ/4, 5λ/4 ...

So the λ in flint flass is λ2=(n1*λ)/n2
= 4.57 * 10^-7

Therefore the shortest thicknss should be λ/4
4.57*10^-7/4
1.14*10^-7

The answer however is wrong the answer is suppose to be 199 nm.

Can someone please help! Thanku
:confused:

The interference is between the incident wave at the air (n1=1) and wave reflecting from the first layer (n2=1.38). Because the second layer has a higher index of refraction, the reflection at the first/second layer surface has a phase shift of [itex]\pi[/itex]. So in order to have destructive interference (a phase difference of [itex]\pi[/itex]), the path length through the first layer to the reflecting surface and back to the air has to be a full wavelength. So the thickness has to be [itex]\lambda_2/2[/itex].

The wavelength in the magnesium fluoride layer is [itex]\lambda_2 = n_1\lambda_1/n_2 = 5.5\times 10^{-7}/1.38 = 3.98\times 10^{-7}m = 398 nm[/itex]

AM
 
I get 99.6nm, not 199nm. Remember to use the n of air, not the flint glass.