Calculate Linear Velocity: 180 deg/s & 0.5 m

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The linear velocity of the foot, given an angular velocity of 180 degrees/s and a radius of 0.5 m, is calculated using the formula linear velocity = angular velocity (w) x radius (r). The correct calculation yields a linear velocity of 1.57 m/s after converting degrees to radians. The initial confusion regarding units was clarified, emphasizing that linear velocity should be expressed in length/time dimensions, specifically m/s.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and linear velocity concepts
  • Familiarity with unit conversion from degrees to radians
  • Basic knowledge of kinematic equations
  • Ability to perform dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about angular velocity and its applications in physics
  • Study unit conversion techniques, particularly between degrees and radians
  • Explore kinematic equations in rotational motion
  • Investigate dimensional analysis for physical quantities
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators and tutors assisting with kinematics and rotational motion concepts.

PepperABLF12
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the linear velocity of the foot if the angular velocity of the dynamometer was 180 degrees/s and the distance from the knee joint to the foot is 0.5 m. Give your answer rounded to two decimal places in m.s-1. (Do not include units in answer).

Homework Equations



linear velocity = angular velocity (w) x radius (r).
linear velocity = w x r.

The Attempt at a Solution



w = 180 degree/s
r = 0.5m
linear velocity = ?

linear velocity = w x r
linear velocity = 180 x 0.5
linear velocity = 90 degrees/s

To find radians, 90/57.3 = 1.57 m/s

Is this correct? And in the right units?

Please help and thank you! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, your relevant equation gives ##0.5 {\rm m}\, \times \,\pi \, {\rm rad/s} = 1.57 \,{\rm m/s}## straightforward.

But your dealing with units is a bit messy. Especially the 90 degrees/s is objectionable. A linear velocity has dimension length/time. The numerics are fine, but the dimensions should read something like: degrees/s / radians/degree x meters/radian

THe writer of the exercise doesn't want to be bothered by these considerations, so he/she asks for a number only.

In my first sentence I let the radians disappear, you could say that I cheat too. My defence is: radians is arc per radius, so length/length and thereby dimensionless: it can be skipped in dimensional expressions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you so much! Great help :)
 
It is easier to understand if you convert to radians first and then calculate the linear velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K