Calculate Net Force on Q3: Charge Position for Zero Net Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter Winzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the position of charge Q3 (3.33·10-6 C) relative to Q1 (1.90·10-6 C) and Q2 (-3.03·10-6 C) such that the net force on Q3 is zero. The charges are fixed 0.279 m apart. The correct approach involves analyzing the electric fields created by Q1 and Q2, concluding that Q3 must be placed to the left of Q1 to achieve equilibrium. The derived equations for electric fields indicate that the net electric field will not cancel out if Q3 is positioned between Q1 and Q2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric fields
  • Familiarity with the concept of electric force and charge interactions
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation for solving equations
  • Basic understanding of charge placement principles in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electric field superposition
  • Learn about Coulomb's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their implications for charge placement
  • Investigate the conditions for equilibrium in systems with multiple charges
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, as well as educators and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric forces and charge interactions.

  • #31
I assume you mean the distance from q3 to q2. r+x. Is that what you meant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
nopes,
but you are/ should be using q1 and q2?
 
  • #33
thought i am using q3 & q1
 
  • #34
oh..that was wrong, I guess
 
  • #35
so what am I using?
 
  • #36
q1, and q2

you are simply lost!, don't you? ^^
 
Last edited:
  • #37
It seems that you are still a bit confused. Remember that you are trying to find out where to put Q3 so that it feels no net force from Q1 + Q2. Since Q3 feels the electric field from Q1 + Q2, this is equivalent to asking where is the net field from Q1 + Q2 equal to zero.

Let's look at the field to the left of Q1 at some point a distance X to the left of Q1. The field from Q1 at that point will be:
E_{q_1} = - \frac{k q_1}{x^2}

Note that I put a negative sign, since the field points to the left.

Now the field from Q2 (realize that if the distance from the point to Q1 is X, then its distance from Q2 must be X + 0.279 m):
E_{q_2} = + \frac{k q_2}{(x + 0.279)^2}

Note that this field points to the right, so it's positive.

Now add them up and solve for the distance (x) that makes the sum equal to zero.

Note that in both of the equations above, I let q_1 and q_2 stand for just the magnitude of the charges. (Don't put in a negative sign twice!)
 
Last edited:
  • #38
Winzer said:
The charges Q1= 1.90·10-6 C and Q2= -3.03·10-6 C are fixed at their positions, distance 0.279 m apart, and the charge Q3= 3.33·10-6 C is moved along the straight line. For what position of Q3 relative to Q1 is the net force on Q3 due to Q1 and Q2 zero? Use the plus sign for Q3 to the right of Q1.

Hey,

In solving this problem refer to the following principle,

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given any two arbitrary un-like sign charges: q_{1} and q_{2}, placed on an axis a distance L from each other. Then, the placement (on that axis) of a charge q_{3} such that the net force on q_{3} due to: q_{1} and q_{2}, will be zero. Can be given as follows,

q_{1}q_{2} < 0 \therefore q_{1}q_{2} \equiv -

<br /> |q_{1}| &lt; |q_{2}|, |\vec{r}_{31}| &lt; |\vec{r}_{32}|, |\vec{r}_{32}| &gt; L<br />

<br /> |q_{1}| = |q_{2}|<br />, No equilibrium exists on that axis.

<br /> |q_{1}| &gt; |q_{2}|, |\vec{r}_{31}| &gt; |\vec{r}_{32}|, |\vec{r}_{32}| &gt; L<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I wrote up this principle up a while back, because these type of (electric charge) physics problems come up so often.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K