Calculate Net Force on Q3: Charge Position for Zero Net Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter Winzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three charges: Q1, Q2, and Q3, where Q1 and Q2 are fixed at a distance apart, and the task is to determine the position of Q3 such that the net force on it due to Q1 and Q2 is zero. The context is within electrostatics, specifically focusing on the interactions between point charges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the placement of Q3 relative to Q1 and Q2, questioning whether it can be positioned between them or to the left of Q1. There are attempts to analyze the forces and electric fields acting on Q3 from both Q1 and Q2.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of where Q3 can be placed to achieve zero net force. Some participants suggest analyzing different regions (left of Q1, between Q1 and Q2, and right of Q2) while others clarify the implications of charge signs and the direction of electric fields. Guidance has been provided regarding the need to consider the electric fields from both charges and their directions.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the regions where Q3 can be placed, particularly about the implications of charge magnitudes and the requirement for the net electric field to be zero. Participants are also addressing the mathematical relationships involved in calculating forces and fields.

Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The charges Q1= 1.90·10-6 C and Q2= -3.03·10-6 C are fixed at their positions, distance 0.279 m apart, and the charge Q3= 3.33·10-6 C is moved along the straight line. For what position of Q3 relative to Q1 is the net force on Q3 due to Q1 and Q2 zero? Use the plus sign for Q3 to the right of Q1.

Homework Equations


[tex]F=\frac{KQq_{1}q_{2}}{r^2}[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


I get 0.6483m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please give the coordinate of each particle along an axis.
 
is the answer 1.06?
 
Q(0,0), Q2(.279,0), Q3(x,0). Where X>.279m
 
Winzer said:
Q(0,0), Q2(.279,0), Q3(x,0). Where X>.279m
That's what I thought you were saying. Note that X > .279 is not a requirement of the problem, but something that you added. In fact, it can't be true!
 
True, i did add that in.
I started by finding the force between q1 and q2:
[tex]F=\frac{9.0e^9 1.90e^-6 -3.03e^-6}{.279^2}=-6.65e^-1N[/tex]
Then I can set that equal to [tex]F=\frac{KQq_{1}q_{2}}{(x-r)^2}[/tex], right?
 
just making it way too complex,
find where E is 0, and that would be the position of Q3
and you would get something like
q/r^2 = q1/(d+r)^2
 
Winzer said:
I started by finding the force between q1 and q2
The force between Q1 and Q2 is irrelevant. You want the force on Q3! (Hint: Where does the electric field of Q1 + Q2 equal zero?)

The first thing I would do is figure out which region Q3 must be in:
(a) to the left of Q1
(b) between Q1 and Q2
(c) to the right of Q2
 
Last edited:
So: [tex]E_{1}+E_{2}=0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{kq_{1}}{x^2}-\frac{kq_{2}}{(r+x)^2}=0[/tex]
 
  • #10
Winzer said:
So: [tex]E_{1}+E_{2}=0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{kq_{1}}{x^2}-\frac{kq_{2}}{(r+x)^2}=0[/tex]
What region are you analyzing? What's the definition of x?

If it's not obvious which region Q3 must be in, study each region systematically.
 
  • #11
the region right of q2. X is distance from q1 to q3
 
  • #12
Winzer said:
the region right of q2. X is distance from q1 to q3
For some reason you are choosing the region to the right of q2 (even though I told you that it was impossible! :wink:). No problem! If x is the distance from q1, what must be the distance from q2 in that region?
 
  • #13
ok, so I the region where E=0, q3 would have to inbetween q1 & q2. getting confused
 
  • #14
Winzer said:
ok, so I the region where E=0, q3 would have to inbetween q1 & q2. getting confused
Don't give up on studying any region. If you pick the wrong region, the equation you get will not give you an answer in the region.

To study the region in between q1 & q2, draw yourself a picture. In that region, which way would the field from q1 point? The field from q2? Could they cancel?
 
  • #15
I know the q1 field is outward and q2 field in inward. So the field(right side) from q1 to q2 will interect with each other.
 
  • #16
Winzer said:
I know the q1 field is outward and q2 field in inward.
Right! So, in the region between q1 and q2, which way does each field point: to the right or to the left? If we let positive stand for "to the right", are the fields positive or negative in that region?
 
  • #17
positve to the right, negitive to the left
 
  • #18
Winzer said:
positve to the right, negitive to the left
That's the sign convention. But which way do the fields point?
 
  • #19
The combination of the q1 and q2 field points to the right.
 
  • #20
Winzer said:
The combination of the q1 and q2 field points to the right.
In that middle region, the field from q1 points to the right (and thus is positive) and the field from q2 also points to the right (and is positive). So is it possible for the fields to cancel out in that region?
 
  • #21
mmm..yes
 
  • #22
Winzer said:
mmm..yes
Answer this: If A is positive and B is positive, can A+B ever equal zero?
 
  • #23
If both A and B are positive than there is an efield that is zero at some point. Because both field lines from A and B will repel each other.
 
  • #24
Winzer said:
If both A and B are positive than there is an efield that is zero at some point.
No. If A and B are positive, their sum must also be positive. They can never add to zero. You can only get 2 numbers to sum to zero if they have different signs.
Because both field lines from A and B will repel each other.
The fields from each charge (q1 & q2) point in the same direction and thus add together--they don't cancel. That tells you that the force on q3 will never be zero if it's placed between q1 and q2. (Now you need to check the other two regions.)
 
  • #25
so I suspect that the only way the fields repel if we put it before q1?
 
  • #26
yep, seems right to me
 
  • #27
so how do i find where the E field will be zero? Super position of E?
 
  • #28
yes, you had that formula E1+E2=0
 
  • #29
so:
[tex]\frac{kq_{3}}{x^2}+\frac{kq_{1}}{(r+x)^2}=0[/tex]
now i don't uderstand the (r+x)^2 part.
 
  • #30
Winzer said:
so:
[tex]\frac{kq_{2}}{x^2}+\frac{kq_{1}}{(r+x)^2}=0[/tex]
now i don't uderstand the (r+x)^2 part.

so, the E is 0 @ x distance left from the smaller positive charge, and thus we know distance between them is r..
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K