Calculate Phosphorus Atoms in 8.75 Moles of H2P2O7 | Stoichiometry Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter sweetshelly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stoichiometry
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the number of phosphorus atoms in 8.75 moles of H2P2O7, one must recognize that each molecule contains two phosphorus atoms. Therefore, the total moles of phosphorus is 2 times 8.75, equating to 17.5 moles of phosphorus. Using Avogadro's number (6.02E23), the total number of phosphorus atoms is calculated as 1.05E25. This calculation is crucial for exam preparation, as it directly impacts the overall grade. Understanding stoichiometry is essential for solving similar problems effectively.
sweetshelly
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
This is the question:
How many phosphorus atoms are contained in 8.75 moles of H2P2O7? Put your answer in E-format with 1 number before and 2 numbers after the decimal place. e.g., 6.02 x 1023 would be input as 6.02E23.



the answer is : 1.05E25 (1.05 × 1025)

I really have no idea where to start. Please someone help me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To start off, how many atoms are there in 1 mole of phosphorus atoms?

This link should aid your understanding.
http://www.fordhamprep.org/gcurran/sho/sho/skills/moleconex.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You've been given 8.75 moles of H2P2O7, which contains 2x8.75 moles of H, 2x8.75 moles of P, and 7x8.75 moles of O. In one mole of anything (H2P2O7, P atoms, eggplants, etc), there are 6.02E23 particles.
 
kinthos said:
You've been given 8.75 moles of H2P2O7, which contains 2x8.75 moles of H, 2x8.75 moles of P, and 7x8.75 moles of O. In one mole of anything (H2P2O7, P atoms, eggplants, etc), there are 6.02E23 particles.

wow thank you so much. This explanation gave me the correct answer. I really appreciate your help a lot. This is part of our exam review. If I didn't know how to solve this problem I would miss it. I can't afford not knowing something b/c we only have 20 questions total. I need an A on tomorrow test to make an A average for the semester. You're the greatest :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top