Calculate pressure of pumped liquid

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter madmike159
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid Pressure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the pressure produced by an oil pump in a cooling system for bearing housings. Participants explore various equations and concepts related to fluid dynamics, including the Hagen-Poiseuille equation and the importance of Reynolds number in determining flow characteristics. The scope includes theoretical and practical considerations for fluid flow in pipes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a simple equation or rule of thumb to calculate the pressure produced when the oil pump is activated, noting confusion about viscosity types.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to know the pump's output head to calculate pressure accurately.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the definition of output head and its relevance to the pressure produced by the pump.
  • References to the Darcy-Weisbach equation are provided, highlighting the importance of calculating the friction factor and Reynolds number to assess flow conditions.
  • One participant mentions having used the Hagen-Poiseuille equation incorrectly due to a unit conversion error, leading to a better understanding of pipe size limitations.
  • Concerns are raised about the appropriateness of the pipe diameter for the required flow rate, suggesting that a larger diameter may be necessary to avoid excessive pressure drops and heating of the oil.
  • Another participant corrects their earlier statement about the flow rate, indicating it was misreported as liters per second instead of liters per hour.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate pipe diameter and flow rates for the cooling system, with some arguing that the initially suggested diameter is too small for the required flow. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal pipe size and the implications for system performance.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for accurate definitions of terms like output head and the Reynolds number, as well as the potential for confusion regarding flow rates and their impact on system design.

madmike159
Gold Member
Messages
369
Reaction score
0
I have a enclosed system for cooling bearing housings with oil. I need to calculate the rough pressure that will be produced when the oil pump is switched on. The oil will be pumped from a small tank, through the system and back into the tank.

Pipe diameter = 10.8mm
Pipe length = aprox 2m
Flow rate = 250L/s
Viscosity (this is where I get confused about Kinematic vs Dynamic)

I am stuck on how to even get started on this. Is there a simple equation/rule of thumb that would allow me to get a rough value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll need to find out more information about your pump. At the minimum, you'll need to know the output head the pump is capable of producing.
 
What do you mean by output head?
 
You are trying to calculate the pressure drop for flow of a fluid through a pipe. You can look up the equations for this in Mechanical engineers Handbook, Chemical Engineers Handbook, or on the internet.
 
madmike159 said:
What do you mean by output head?

A pump works by changing the pressure of the fluid it is pumping. The output head refers to the amount of pressure the pump is capable of producing.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pump

under the section 'Laraib Pumping Power' at the bottom of the article.
 
Baluncore said:
The key to using this reference is to get the friction factor f, which is a function of the Reynolds number Re. You need to first calculate the Reynolds number, and then check to determine whether it is above or below the critical value for transition to turbulent flow (2100). In your case, it is almost certainly above the critical value. You then use the relationship between f and Re that is applicable to turbulent flow. This relationship can be found in the references I cited in my earlier post.

Chet
 
Thanks guys. I had already found the Hagen-Poiseuille Equation, but I used the flow rate incorrectly (m^3/h rather than m^3/s). I now have a reasonable answer and know a limit of the size of pipe I should use.
 
madmike159 said:
Thanks guys. I had already found the Hagen-Poiseuille Equation, but I used the flow rate incorrectly (m^3/h rather than m^3/s). I now have a reasonable answer and know a limit of the size of pipe I should use.
Don't forget that Hagen-Poiseuille applies only to laminar flow (Re<2100). If the reynolds number is higher than this, you need to use the turbulent flow correlation for the friction factor. Otherwise, you will be underestimating the pressure drop. So, check the Re.

Chet
 
  • #10
Fundamentally, a cooling system should be operating at the lowest pressure possible that achives the required flow. If the flow is limited by pipe size then power will be wasted moving the oil through the tube. That will heat the oil which makes cooling the gearbox more difficult.

I think the OP may have been based on assumed data. If 250 L/s is required to achieve the required cooling then the 10.8mm pipe diameter is far too small to be in laminar flow.

There are nomographs for deciding the pipe diameter needed in hydraulic applications.
See for example; http://www.ryco.com.au/index.php?id=196
This shows you need something closer to a 50mm diameter pipe for that flow rate.

Your 10.8 mm tube would support only 25 L/s.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Sorry madmike159,
I just found your intermediate post with the corrected flow reduction by a factor of 3600 = 70 mL/s.
 
  • #12
Chestermiller said:
Don't forget that Hagen-Poiseuille applies only to laminar flow (Re<2100). If the reynolds number is higher than this, you need to use the turbulent flow correlation for the friction factor. Otherwise, you will be underestimating the pressure drop. So, check the Re.

Chet

Thanks, I didn't think to check the Reynolds number. As Baluncore said, my flow rate is far to high which explains some higher than expected oil temperatures. I won't be blindly choosing the first pump I find next time.
 
  • #13
Baluncore said:
Your 10.8 mm tube would support only 25 L/s.

Just realized my OP was incorrect. The pump is rated to 250L/h not L/s...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
562
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K