Calculate the age of the Universe at a temperature

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the age of the Universe at a temperature of 1 MeV, with the assumption that a(t=0)=0. The calculated Hubble parameter at this temperature is H(1 MeV) ≈ 0.6 s-1, leading to a derived age of t = 0.85 s. The importance of the initial condition a(t=0)=0 is clarified as essential for defining the integration constant in the Friedmann equation, ensuring a correct derivation of the relationship H = 1/2 t-1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Friedmann equations in cosmology
  • Knowledge of Hubble parameter calculations
  • Familiarity with radiation-dominated Universe models
  • Basic integration techniques in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Friedmann equations in cosmology
  • Learn about the implications of initial conditions in cosmological models
  • Explore the relationship between temperature and the expansion rate of the Universe
  • Investigate the role of the Hubble parameter in cosmological dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students studying cosmology, particularly those interested in the early Universe and the dynamics of cosmic expansion.

Denver Dang
Messages
143
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I've been told to calculate the age of the Universe at T = 1 \, \text{MeV}, assuming that a(t=0)=0.

Homework Equations


Now, I've already calculated the value of H at that temperature, which was around H(1\,\text{MeV}) \approx 0.6 \,\text{s}^{-1}. I've also shown, that in a radiation dominated Universe, which I assume much be the case at T = 1 \, \text{MeV}, that:
H = \frac{1}{2}t^{-1}

The Attempt at a Solution


So basically, my idea was just to solve for t in that equation, and use the value for H I calculated, and then I end up with t = 0.85 \, \text{s}, which seems okay reasonable to me, but, my main question is the info: "assuming that a(t=0)=0". I haven't really used that information here, so either it's just not important, or I have missed something. But what ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot derive ##H = \frac{1}{2}t^{-1}## without that convention. It is needed to define where t=0 is.
 
Well, I have shown that:

\rho _R =\rho_{R0}\left(\frac{a_0}{a}\right)^{4}

So from the Friedmann equation I get:

\begin{align}
\frac{\dot a^{2}}{a^{2}} &= \frac{8 \pi G}{3} \frac{\rho_{R0}}{a^{4}} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
\left(a\frac{da}{dt}\right)^{2} &= \frac{8 \pi G}{3} \rho_{R0} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
a\frac{da}{dt} &= \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi G}{3}\rho_{R0}} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
a\,da &= \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi G}{3}\rho_{R0}} \,\, dt \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
\int a\, da &= \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi G}{3}\rho_{R0}} \int dt \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
\frac{1}{2} a^{2} &= \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi G}{3}\rho_{R0}} \, t \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
a &= \sqrt[4]{\frac{32 \pi G}{3}\rho_{R0}} \, t^{1/2} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
a &\propto t^{1/2}
\end{align}

And from that I, again, can use the Friedmann equation, giving:

\begin{align}
H &= \frac{\dot a}{a} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
H &= \frac{\frac{da}{dt}}{a} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
H &= \frac{1}{t^{1/2}} \frac{d}{dt}t^{1/2} \nonumber \\
&= \frac{1}{t^{1/2}} \left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{t^{1/2}}\right) \nonumber \\
&= \frac{1}{2} t^{-1}
\end{align}

That's how I got the other equation.
 
The step where you perform the integration over dt and over a da should have a free integration constant. Fixing a(t=0)=0 sets this constant to zero.
 
Hmmm, I'm not sure I follow. How does that help me ?
 
What do you mean with "help"? You asked where you need the additional information you had, and I answered that question. The result is the same as before, but now with a correct derivation.
 
Ah, I see what you mean now. Sorry for the confusing on my part.
Thank you very much :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K