Calculate the ratio of the time the jumper is above ymax/2

  • Thread starter Thread starter killerinstinct
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio Time
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of the time an athlete is above half of the maximum height (ymax/2) during a vertical jump. The problem is situated within the context of kinematics, focusing on the motion of a particle under the influence of gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of kinematic equations and gravitational potential energy to analyze the jump. There are questions about the time ratios involved and the implications of different approaches to the problem. Some participants express confusion regarding the setup and the algebraic manipulation needed to simplify their findings.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the algebraic relationships and kinematic principles involved in the problem. Some participants have offered insights into potential simplifications and have engaged in clarifying the correct interpretation of the time ratios. However, there is no explicit consensus on the final ratio, and participants continue to seek clarification on their calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are constrained to using kinematics only, which limits the methods available for solving the problem. There is also a noted confusion regarding the interpretation of the variables and the algebraic expressions involved.

killerinstinct
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
An athlete jumps vertically. treat athlete as particle and Ymax is the maximum height above the floor the athlete achieves. To explain why he seems to hang in the air, calculate the ratio of the time he is above ymax/2 to the time it takes him to go from the floor to that height.

we get 2 equations,
Vymax/2 = V0Y-gt_1
Vymax = Vymax/2 - gt_2

after isolating t
we get:
2t_2 / t_1 = 2 Vymax/2 / V0y-Vymax/2

V0Y - Vymax/2 < Vymax/2
<<<< how do you go about explaining this in common language??

the time it takes for person to reach ymax/2 from Yground is les thatn time it takes the person to reach Ymax from Ymax/2, so Vavg from Yground to Ymax/2 is greater thatn Ymax/2 to Ymax.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You already know that Vymax = 0

Use gravitational potential energy to calculate the velocity at ymax/2 in terms of v0

Then you'll know the velocity at the bottom... v0, velocity at ymax/2, and the velocity at ymax which equals 0.

so then you can calculate the times... why did you 2t_2 / t_1 instead of t_2/t_1?
 
i set t_2 as time from ymax/2 to ymax. so the time above ymax/2 is 2t2.
gravitational potential??
mgh = mv^2/2??
 
on this problem, I'm only allowed to use kinematics. as much as i want to use energy, i can't.
 
Last edited:
killerinstinct said:
i set t_2 as time from ymax/2 to ymax. so the time above ymax/2 is 2t2.
gravitational potential??
mgh = mv^2/2??

EDIT: Never mind you're absolutely right about the 2t_2/t_1. I misunderstood the question.

Yeah, mgh = mv^2/2 was what I was thinking.

You can also get the velocity at ymax/2 using...

vf^2 = vi^2 + 2as
 
Last edited:
ya but t1 is time from bottom to middle. the question asks for 2t2/t1 not t2/t1. but anyways, that's technical... no big deal.

wouldn't using vf^2 = vi^2 +2as make this more complicated than it is??

i already got a ratio of 2Vymax/2 to Voy-Vymax/2
there is a way to simplify that?? by substituting in another equation. I don't see how it would simplify it. maybe I'm just bad at algebra, can you show me?
 
killerinstinct said:
ya but t1 is time from bottom to middle. the question asks for 2t2/t1 not t2/t1. but anyways, that's technical... no big deal.

Yeah, you're right. I was misunderstanding.


wouldn't using vf^2 = vi^2 +2as make this more complicated than it is??

i already got a ratio of 2Vymax/2 to Voy-Vymax/2
there is a way to simplify that?? by substituting in another equation. I don't see how it would simplify it. maybe I'm just bad at algebra, can you show me?

2t_2 / t_1 = 2 Vymax/2 / V0y-Vymax/2

This doesn't simplify unless you write Vymax/2 in terms of V0y... the question wants you to get the actual number for this ratio...

Also be careful not to confuse Vymax/2 with (Vymax)/2 = 0 (since Vymax = 0)... might be better to write Vx where x = ymax/2... or something like that.
 
vx^2=v0y^2 + 2 a ymax/2

you get:
2 sqrt (Voy^2-2gYmax/2) to Voy- sqrt (V0y^2-2gymax/2) RATIO

how do you simplify that??
 
killerinstinct said:
vx^2=v0y^2 + 2 a ymax/2

you get:
2 sqrt (Voy^2-2gYmax/2) to Voy- sqrt (V0y^2-2gymax/2) RATIO

how do you simplify that??

Use the same equation again, but this time to get ymax in terms of v0. ie: vx = 0, s = ymax.
 
  • #10
Ymax = Voy^2/2g.
sub in and i get
2sqrt(2gYmax/2) to V0y-sqrt(2gYmax/2)

sub in V0y

and i get
2sqrt(2gYmax/2) to sqrt (2gYmax) - sqrt (2gYmax/2)

some algebra help... how you simplify what's in bold...

if I'm doing it right... i get 2 to 1 ratio?? that doesn't sound right.
 
  • #11
killerinstinct said:
Ymax = Voy^2/2g.
sub in and i get
2sqrt(2gYmax/2) to V0y-sqrt(2gYmax/2)

sub in V0y

and i get
2sqrt(2gYmax/2) to sqrt (2gYmax) - sqrt (2gYmax/2)

some algebra help... how you simplify what's in bold...

if I'm doing it right... i get 2 to 1 ratio?? that doesn't sound right.

sqrt(gYmax) cancels from the numerator and denominator...

You should get: \frac{2}{\sqrt{2} - 1}
 
  • #12
wait... i did it again and got ratio of
2 to sqrt2 - 1
is that right??
 
  • #13
i guess i did it right..
i knew the physics of this problem. but i couldn't figure out the algebra.
greatly appreciate your algebra lesson. thank you very much.
 
  • #14
killerinstinct said:
i guess i did it right..
i knew the physics of this problem. but i couldn't figure out the algebra.
greatly appreciate your algebra lesson. thank you very much.

no prob! good job!
 
  • #15
killerinstinct said:
wait... i did it again and got ratio of
2 to sqrt2 - 1
is that right??

yeah, that's what I got.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K