Calculate the work (Thermodynamics)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the total work done during a thermodynamic process involving an ideal gas. The gas undergoes an expansion at constant pressure, followed by an isothermal compression, and finally cools back to its initial pressure. Participants are exploring the implications of these processes on work done.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for work done during isothermal processes and question the variables used in the equations. There are attempts to clarify the definitions of terms like volume and pressure in the context of the ideal gas law.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants providing guidance on how to approach the problem. Some have pointed out potential mistakes in the application of formulas, while others emphasize the importance of analyzing each step of the process separately. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in understanding the energy changes throughout the process.

Contextual Notes

Participants express frustration regarding the lack of examples in their reference materials, which contributes to the difficulty in grasping the concepts involved. There is also mention of the need to consider the energy balance during the entire cycle of processes.

alivedude
Messages
58
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



An ideal gas with pressure ##p_1=2## bar and volume ##V_1=3 \, m^3## is expanding under constant pressure to the volume ##V_2=3V_1##. Then we compress the gas isothermally back to ##V_1##. Finally the gas cools down to initial pressure ##p_1##. Calculate the total amount of work.

Homework Equations



Work done is given by ##W=-\int_{V_1}^{V_2}pdV##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The first work is isobar so we have that
##W_1 = -p(V_2-V_1)##

For the last part we have that ##dV=0## so work done there is 0.

What about the second part? Work done for an isothermal compression is ##W=-vRT\ln\frac{V_2}{V_1}## but I have no information about the temperatur or number of mols. Can anyone guide me in the right direction?

The answer is ##780## kJ but I can't get there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

alivedude said:
##W=-vRT\ln\frac{V_2}{V_1}##

There is a mistake in this equation, this could be the problem.
 
What is the mistake? I use the ideal gas law ##pV=vRT##

##W=-vRT\int_{V_1}^{v_2} \frac{dV}{V} = -vRT \ln \frac{V_2}{V_1}##
 
alivedude said:
##pV=vRT##

Maybe there is a misunderstanding in used letters: What dimension/value does ##v## have in your formula?
 
stockzahn said:
Maybe there is a misunderstanding in used letters: What dimension/value does ##v## have in your formula?

Oh I'm sorry! It's in mol
 
OK, sorry too, I'm used to a different nomenclature. In your formulas

##pV=vRT## & ##W=-vRT\ln\frac{V_2}{V_1}##

you already have the solution. Just combine them. Hint: How does the product ##p⋅V## behave during an isothermal change of state?
 
stockzahn said:
OK, sorry too, I'm used to a different nomenclature. In your formulas

##pV=vRT## & ##W=-vRT\ln\frac{V_2}{V_1}##

you already have the solution. Just combine them. Hint: How does the product ##p⋅V## behave during an isothermal change of state?
Im feeling bit slow here but i just can't see where i go wrong. I plug in ##pV## instead of ##vRT## and add the works

##W_{tot} = -p_1(V_2-V_1) - p_1V_2\ln \frac{V_2}{V_1} ##

clearly this is wrong?
 
In your first post you already figured out, that for step (3) ΔW=0:

alivedude said:
For the last part we have that ##dV=0## so work done there is 0.

To be able to reach the initial state again, there must be one step where the energy difference of the gas is positive and one step where it is negative. Your equation treats both steps like energy losses (work done by the gas).

alivedude said:
Im feeling bit slow here but i just can't see where i go wrong. I plug in ##pV## instead of ##vRT## and add the works

##W_{tot} = -p_1(V_2-V_1) - p_1V_2\ln \frac{V_2}{V_1} ##

clearly this is wrong?
 
Last edited:
stockzahn said:
In your first post you already figured out, that for step (3) ΔW=0:
To be able to reach the initial state again, there must be one step where the energy difference of the gas is positive and one step where it is negative. Your equation treats both steps like energy losses.
To be honest, I have no idea what to do at this moment. The book i have is written by my professor and there is ZERO examples, just theory through the whole thing and I'm getting so frustrated. I have no idea what to do and I can't figure it out either.

This is what I'm thinking:

Since we reach the initial point the change in energy overall is zero. That means that the energy we add to the system by work is exactly the same as the amount of energy that we take away in form of heat when we cool the gas in step 3. During the cooling no work is done, so the only work comes from step 1 and 2. Then why isn't my calculation right here above?
 
  • #10
alivedude said:
Since we reach the initial point the change in energy overall is zero.

Correct

alivedude said:
That means that the energy we add to the system by work is exactly the same as the amount of energy that we take away in form of heat when we cool the gas in step 3.

Not necessarily. You have to analyse each step seperatly to find out, during which step work is done by the gas (ΔW < 0) and during which step work is put into the gas (ΔW > 0). Have a look at the volume of the gas: Depending on its change, whether it is increasing or decreasing, work is done by the gas or put into the gas.
 
  • #11
stockzahn said:
Correct
Not necessarily. You have to analyse each step seperatly to find out, during which step work is done by the gas (ΔW < 0) and during which step work is put into the gas (ΔW > 0). Have a look at the volume of the gas: Depending on its change, whether it is increasing or decreasing, work is done by the gas or put into the gas.

Found out what the problem was and now i have the right answer.

My calculation for the work above was correct but I used ##ln\frac{9}{3}## instead of ##ln\frac{3}{9}##. I wasn't paying attention that i was suppose to go back to ##3 m^3## again.

Anyway, thanks for all the patience you had with me!
 
  • #12
You're welcome, I hope I could help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K