Calculate Theoretical Yield of Sn(C2H5)4 from SnCl4 & Al(C2H5)3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Destrio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the theoretical yield of tetraethylstannane (Sn(C2H5)4) from the reaction of tin(IV) chloride (SnCl4) and triethylaluminum (Al(C2H5)3). The reaction stoichiometry indicates that SnCl4 is the limiting reagent. Participants detail their calculations for the molar masses of the compounds and the mass of reactants used, revealing discrepancies in their results. A key point of confusion arises from the molar mass calculation of Al(C2H5)3, with participants correcting each other on the proper values. The final yield calculation is clarified, leading to a corrected theoretical yield of approximately 462 grams of Sn(C2H5)4.
Destrio
Messages
211
Reaction score
0
Organotin compounds play a significant role in diverse industrial applications. They have been used as plastic stabilizers and as pesticides or fungicides.
One method used to prepare simple tetraalkylstannanes is the controlled direct reaction of liquid tin(IV) chloride with highly reactive trialkylaluminum compounds, such as liquid triethylaluminum (Al(C2H5)3).

3SnCl4 + 4Al(C2H5)3 --> 3Sn(C2H5)4 + 4AlCl3

In one experiment, 0.230 L of SnCl4 (d = 2.226 g/mL) was treated with 0.497 L of triethylaluminum (Al(C2H5)3); d = 0.835 g/mL).
What is the theoretical yield in this experiment (mass of tetraethylstannane, Sn(C2H5)4)?

My attempt:

#mol SnCl4 = .230 L x 2226g/L x 1mol/260.6g
= 1.96537428 mol SnCl4

#mol Al(C2H5)3 = .497L x 835g/L x 1mol/114.16g
= 3.645204975 mol Al(C2H5)3

3SnCl4 mol : 4Al(C2H5)3 mol

1.97mol SnCl4 x 4mol Al(C2H5)3 / 4 mol SnCl4
= 2.66 mol Al(C2H5)3

Sn Cl4 is limiting

#g Sn(C2H5)4 = 7.86146712 mol SnCl4 x (3 mol SnCl4 / 3mol Sn(C2H5)4) x 234.94g / mol
= 1846.980133g

As far as I know I did all the steps correctly, so I'm not sure where I went went. I have checked my calculations over but I'm still getting a wrong answer.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Disclaimer: I'm just a student too. I could be completely off.
I also used this periodic table: http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/ibis/cds/classware/PeriodicTable.swf

First, I figured out what the molar mass of each compound was.

SnCl_4

1 Sn: 118.69
4 Cl: 35.453*4=141.812
SnCl_4 = 260.5036 (I don't apply sig figs until I come to the answer)

Al(C_2H_5)_3

1 Al: 26.98
6 C: 72.066
15 H: 15.12
Al(C_2H_5)_3 = 88.186

Then, I took D=M/V to figure out how many grams of each element I was working with, by multiplying both sides of the equation by V, since we are given D and V. After converting L to mL, this is what I came up with


230 mL of SnCl_4 * 2.226 g/mL = 511.98 g SnCl_4 (mL cancel)
497 mL Al(C_2H_5)_3 * 0.835 g/mL = 414.995 g Sn(C_2H_5)_3

Then I set up my stoichemetry, and plugged the numbers:


511.98 g SnCl_4 * 1 mol SnCl_4/260.5036 g * 4 mol Al(C_2H_5)_3/3 mol SnCl_4 * 88.186 g Al(C_2H_5)_3/1 mol Al(C_2H_5)_3 = 231 g Al(C_2H_5)_3 (after sig figging it)

Honestly, just took for granted that SnCl_4 was the limiting reagent, so I converted it into how many g of Al(C_2H_5)_3 you'd find. Hope that helps!
 
Al(C_2H_5)_3

1 Al: 26.98
6 C: 72.066
15 H: 15.12
Al(C_2H_5)_3 = 88.186

how did you get 88.186?
those 3 values add up to be 114.166

thanks
 
Destrio said:
Al(C_2H_5)_3

1 Al: 26.98
6 C: 72.066
15 H: 15.12
Al(C_2H_5)_3 = 88.186

how did you get 88.186?
those 3 values add up to be 114.166

thanks

Miscalculation :). Like I said, student here as well.
 
ok, thanks for your help anyways
I'll post the solution if I can figure it out
 
1.96537428 mol SnCl4

not 7.86146712 SnCl4 for final equation

= 4.62×10^2 g

solved
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top