Calculate Torque to Accelerate .22kg Disk to 1500rpm in 5s

  • Thread starter Thread starter guru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disk
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the torque required to accelerate a 0.22 kg disk to 1500 rpm in 5 seconds, the moment of inertia for a solid disk is used, given by I = (1/2)mr^2. The angular acceleration is determined by the change in angular velocity over time, resulting in an alpha of 31.42 rad/s². The torque is then calculated using the formula τ = Iα, leading to a torque value of 1496.2 Nm. However, there is skepticism regarding the high torque value for such a lightweight disk, suggesting that it may require significantly less torque over a longer time frame. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the physics principles involved in the calculations.
guru
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A .22kg , .22-m-diameter plastic disk is spun on an axle through its center by an electric motor. What torque must the motor supply to take the disk from 0 to 1500 rpm in 5.00 ?

I used the equations
T(thau)=alpha/I
w_f=w_i + alpha*(t_f - t_i)
I found I to be equal to .021kgm^2
then found w_f for the first .5s to be:
(1500rev/1min) * (1min/60s) *(2pi/1rev) = 157.08rad/s
157.08=0+alpha*(.5s)
alpha = 31.42rad/s^2
T= 31.42/.021 = 1496.2Nm

Am not totally sure of my calculations. I will greatly appreciate any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't done this in a very long time, but isn't \tau=I\alpha

And I=mr^2

Also, is the time 5 seconds? or 0.5 seconds?

P.S.

You might want to convert your answer into foot pounds and think about the problem intuitively. Is it really going to take over 1000 ft/lbs of torque to spin a little lightweight plastic disk to 1500 rpm?
 
Last edited:
NeutronStar said:
I haven't done this in a very long time, but isn't \tau=I\alpha

And I=mr^2

Also, is the time 5 seconds? or 0.5 seconds?

P.S.

You might want to convert your answer into foot pounds and think about the problem intuitively. Is it really going to take over 1000 ft/lbs of torque to spin a little lightweight plastic disk to 1500 rpm?


Yes, you are right \tau=I\alpha
However, i believe I=(1/2)mr^2
Also, it is 5seconds not .5s. I made a mistake
Am supposed to give my answer in Nm
 
Last edited:
guru said:
Yes, you are right \tau=I\alpha
However, i believe I=(1/2)mr^2
Also, it is 5seconds not .5s. I made a mistake
Am supposed to give my answer in Nm

You're right about the moment of inertia for a solid disk.

It would be I=(1/2)mr^2 for a solid disk.

I was thinking of a pendulum because I work with clocks a lot. :biggrin:

I didn't mean for you to turn your answer in in units of ft-lbs. I simply meant to convert it to ft-lbs to think about it intuitively to check whether or not the answer makes sense. Although that's because I identify with ft-lbs easier. Maybe Nm work better for you intuitively.

I just thought that your answer is an aweful lot of torque to spin such a small lightweight disk to 1500 rpm (even in a half a second). But if you have 5 seconds to get it spinning 1500 rpm it shouldn't take much torque at all. I would expect a very low amount of torque to be required. That's just my intuitive guess.
 
Heres the proper way to compute this answer:

Torque = Moment of Inertia * Angular Acceleration.
Moment of Inertia = 1/2 * MR^2. (For a disk)
Angular Acceleration = change in omega / change in time.

*Make sure you understand this. If not, please reply or PM me.

Physics is Phun

**Sorry about posting in an older thread, but as many students find, mastering physics repeats its questions so I am sure we will have students searching through the forums.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top