Calculating Acceleration and Tension in a Simple Force Question | Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter oreosama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a load of bricks and a counterweight connected by a rope over a frictionless pulley. The original poster seeks to determine the acceleration of the masses and the tension in the rope, using fundamental equations of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive expressions for acceleration and tension using force equations. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the direction of forces and the relationship between the two masses. Others suggest visualizing the problem with a diagram to clarify the forces acting on each mass.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various calculations and interpretations. Some have provided guidance on the need for a clear understanding of the forces involved, while others have confirmed specific calculations regarding tension. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the forces and accelerations of the two masses.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the direction of forces and the assumptions made in the calculations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their approach and seeks clarification on their reasoning.

oreosama
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a load of bricks of mass m hangs from one end of a rope that passes over a small frictionless pulley. a counterweight, twice as heavy, is suspended from the other end of the rope. given m determine the accel of the masses and the tension in the rope

Homework Equations


f=ma


The Attempt at a Solution



Fa=-2mg + T

2m*a=-2mg + T

a= (-2mg+T)/2m

plug in accel in other force

Fb = -mg + T

m((-2mg+T)/2m) = -mg + T

-2mg + T = -2mg + 2T

T = 2T

T=0?


i have no idea if I am doing anything remotely close to the right path, if I'm way off please explain like a baby as I'm confused thanks for help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fa=-2mg + T

2m*a=-2mg + T

a= (-2mg+T)/2m

plug in accel in other force

Fb = -mg + T

m((-2mg+T)/2m) = -mg + T

-2mg + T = -2mg + 2T
----------------------------
FFrom your calculation for Fa, T is greater than 2mg, so it is going up.
When one side going up, the other side should be going down.

But for calculation for Fb, T is greater than mg. It means going up, where you have assumed that it should be going down.
It is a single cable.
 
m(a-g)+T= 2mg-T
ma= 3mg-2T
a=(3g-2(T/m))

this is the acceleration of the mass?
 
You would understand the problem better with a drawing showing the forces on both objects, brick and counterweight, as in the attachment.

In what direction will the brick and counterweight move? What is the net force acting on the brick? What is the net force acting on the counterweight?
How are the accelerations related?

ehild
 

Attachments

  • brickpulley.JPG
    brickpulley.JPG
    6.5 KB · Views: 439
so since pulley requires each to go in opposite direction you make one force negative relative to coordinate system:

(using fa from above)

fb = -mg + T
-ma = -mg + T

...

T = 4/3mg?
 
T=4/3 mg is correct.

ehild
 
I don't want to open another thread
A block of ice of mass m is released from rest at the top of a frictionless ramp of length L. at the bottom of the incline the speed of the ice is v1. given m,L,v1 determine

the time needed to hit the bottom
the angle between the ramp and the horizontal
the accel of the ice

I made my coordinate system slant at the angle of the ramp because I thought this would make it less work

http://i.imgur.com/d18GN.png

(is this okay?)
x0 = 0
x = L
v0 = 0
v = v1
a= A
t = T

v1 = 0 + AT

T = v1/A

v1^2 = 2AL

A = v1^2 / 2L

T = v1 / (v1^2 / 2L)

T = 2L / v1

I got these answers pretty cleanly but I have no idea what I should be doing to get theta since I don't see a way to get the lengths of the potential triangle with hypoteneus L
 
a=gSinθ
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K