Calculating Acceleration with Mass and Power

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a 750,000,000-kilogram object in a vacuum, driven by 200,000 gigawatts of power. The key equations involve the relationship between power, force, and velocity, specifically using the formula: power = force * velocity and acceleration = force / mass = power / (mass * velocity). The conversation also explores advanced propulsion technologies, including matter-antimatter annihilation rockets, and the complexities of achieving desired velocities while considering energy requirements and mass implications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of power and energy in physics
  • Knowledge of relativistic physics and its implications on acceleration
  • Basic principles of propulsion technologies, particularly advanced concepts like matter-antimatter annihilation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Relativistic Rocket Equation for advanced propulsion calculations
  • Study the principles of matter-antimatter annihilation and its applications in propulsion
  • Explore the concept of thrust-to-weight ratio in rocket science
  • Investigate the feasibility of various advanced propulsion technologies, including gravity manipulation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in advanced propulsion systems and the physics of acceleration in a vacuum.

PhoenixKnight
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello,

First, I'm not much of a physicist. My area of study is largely in environmental sciences and geology, but I've been trying to determine the appropriate equations to use to calculate the rate of acceleration for an object in a vacuum using its mass and the power available to drive it.

I was hoping that someone might be able to help me with this problem.

The mass of the object is 750,000,000 kilograms, and the power available is 200,000 gigawatts.

How does one calculate the acceleration using these values?

Thanks in advance,

~Phoenix Knight
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I depends how you drive it and how that nominal power is defined. If the power is the change in kinetic energy in the initial rest frame, then it cannot be a fixed value because the force would go to infinity at low speeds:

power = force * velocity
acceleration = force / mass = power / (mass * velocity)

But this is just at non relativistic speeds.
 
Alright, so there is more information required to determine this?

Would these values help?

- The object has an initial velocity of 3070.00 m/s.
- The desired cruising velocity is 98.2% of c (294,396,193.76 m/s)
- The drive is exerting a constant force produced by 200,000 gigawatts of energy.

How does the velocity affect the acceleration?

Ultimately, I want to know how long it will take the object to accelerate from its initial velocity to its cruising speed.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
PhoenixKnight said:
- The drive is exerting a constant force produced by 200,000 gigawatts of energy.
What kind of drive? What do the 200,000 gigawatt represent? You can calculate all kinds of energies in all kinds of reference frames.

If it is a rocket with constant thrust, but non-constant mass (due to fuel consumption) you have to use this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_rocket#Relativistic_rocket_equation
 
For this scenario I have been assuming the drive to be a very advanced technology that consumes little to no mass.

Perhaps something that employs manipulation of gravity, negative mass or distortion of space-time to produce propulsion? However, I do not want the hypothetical technology to be any kind of alcubierre or related warp drive because I want to limit the object to sub-luminal velocities.

It is, however, proving quite difficult to find any real information on feasible drive technologies with a minimal requirement for reaction mass...

Any suggestions?
 
Matter-Antimatter is actually something I considered. The only questions I have about it are how much anti-matter would be needed to accelerate to cruising velocity and then decelerate back to a resting velocity? And how do you get that much anti-matter?

Thanks for your help, by the way. I'm finding your input very helpful!
 
Even if your drive uses no reaction mass, the incredible amount of energy required for what you want will still add considerable mass to the spaceship...if you intend to carry the energy on board, of course.

Besides that, "how do you get that much antimatter?" is trivial compared to the MANY other questions you need to answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
892
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K