Calculating air gun energy vs PSI & bore diameter

In summary, a few different setups with barrel bore diameters .224, .308, .5, .77 can produce different levels of energy in projectiles. Bullet or pellet weight can range from 20 grains up to 900 grains, and arrows or bolts can weigh from 150-300 grains. The pressure in the guns can run from 2500-3000psi, and the driving force for a projectile is defined by the pressure and atmospheric pressure difference. The projectile will exit the barrel with a velocity and energy determined by the force through the distance of the barrel.
  • #1
R_Rose
16
0
So I'm trying to figure out what kind of energy that I can expect out of a few different setups.

Here are the barrel bore diameters.
.224
.308
.5
.77
The barrels are usually rifles and some projectiles are full size (size of bore) while others use sabot's where a .224 or .308 can be shot from the larger bores of .5 or .77 using a plastic adapter.
"bullet" or pellet weight can range from 20 grains up to 900 grains over the 4 bores.

There are also arrows or bolts that can be fired using something like a sabot to make a seal around the shaft and the arrows weigh about 150-300 grains.The pressure in these guns usually run from 2500-3000psi when fully charged but there are some that can reach 5000 with special equipment (and being built for such pressure). I'm trying to figure out what the calculations would be to determine the energy being put behind a projectile using these PSI ratings as well as how much energy might be in the projectile itself (how many joules or ft/lbs and maybe how fast it could be expected to travel).

Expect the barrels to run from 16-28 " and can be made for ideal power.

Can anyone help me in figuring out where to start for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Get a copy of The Airgun from Trigger to Target, by Cardew and Cardew. It's mostly about spring piston airguns, but they also cover precharged pneumatics. It's an excellent place to start.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #3
I think you may be able to ballpark this using some simplifying assumptions...
  • Assume that the driving pressure doesn't drop during the shot (requires a high pressure, moderate volume reservior)
  • Calculate the net force on the projectile using the driving pressure and atmospheric pressure (to give you the pressure difference) and the cross-sectional area of the barrel and projectile
  • That net force will accelerate the projectile for the duration of the barrel length
  • The projectile will exit the barrel with a velocity and energy defined by the force through the distance (length of the barrel)
Does that make sense? Can you post those calculations so we can check them? Also, can you post what the first order corrections should be to this simplified calculation to get a better match to real-world numbers? :smile:

EDIT / ADD -- and please be sure to include units in the equations you post -- that helps to provide a sanity check on calculations and unit conversions (like grains to grams to kilograms)...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #4
berkeman: Unfortunately, that is likely to give a result that is substantially too high, since an airgun like this will be firing the projectile at a speed which is non-negligible relative to the mean molecular thermal speed in the gas itself. As a result, as the projectile accelerates, the driving pressure will decrease because a significant portion of the gas's energy is going into accelerating the driving gas, not just the projectile. You could maybe assume isentropic acceleration of the gas with the projectile and get a better estimate that way, though it'll be a significantly more complex problem.
 
  • #5
cjl said:
berkeman: Unfortunately, that is likely to give a result that is substantially too high, since an airgun like this will be firing the projectile at a speed which is non-negligible relative to the mean molecular thermal speed in the gas itself. As a result, as the projectile accelerates, the driving pressure will decrease because a significant portion of the gas's energy is going into accelerating the driving gas, not just the projectile. You could maybe assume isentropic acceleration of the gas with the projectile and get a better estimate that way, though it'll be a significantly more complex problem.
Sure, that's why I asked him/her to also post their thoughts on first order corrections. :smile:
 

Related to Calculating air gun energy vs PSI & bore diameter

1. How is air gun energy calculated?

Air gun energy is typically calculated by multiplying the pressure (in PSI) by the volume of the air chamber (in cubic inches) and dividing by a constant factor. This calculation assumes that all of the compressed air is used to propel the pellet or projectile.

2. What is the relationship between PSI and air gun energy?

The higher the PSI, the greater the potential energy of the compressed air. This means that a higher PSI will result in a more powerful shot from the air gun.

3. How does bore diameter affect air gun energy?

The bore diameter, or the size of the barrel, can impact the air gun energy by affecting the amount of air that is released with each shot. A larger bore diameter will allow more air to be released, resulting in a higher energy output.

4. Is there a limit to how much air gun energy can be generated?

Yes, there are limits to how much air gun energy can be generated. This is determined by the design and capabilities of the air gun, as well as any safety regulations that may be in place.

5. Can air gun energy be increased by increasing the PSI or bore diameter?

Yes, increasing the PSI or bore diameter can increase the potential energy of the air gun. However, it is important to note that safety should always be a top priority and any modifications to the air gun should be done carefully and responsibly.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
462
Replies
1
Views
88
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
203
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top