Calculating Atomic Mass: How Many Grams in 1 amu?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roger Wilco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grams
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass in grams of 1 atomic mass unit (amu), it's important to understand the relationship between amu, grams, and moles. One amu is defined as 1/12 the mass of a carbon-12 atom, which translates to approximately 1.66 x 10^-24 grams. Since there are 6.022 x 10^23 atoms in a mole, the conversion from amu to grams involves using Avogadro's number. The calculation shows that 1 amu is equivalent to 1 gram per mole divided by Avogadro's number, resulting in a mass of about 1.66 x 10^-24 grams per amu. This understanding clarifies the connection between atomic mass units and grams in chemistry.
Roger Wilco
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am reviewing some very general chemistry and for some reason I cannot come up with a method of approach for this problem?

I know that there are 1 amu/atom and that there are 1g/mol and that there are 6.022*10^24 atoms/mol.

How do I put it all together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind. I am stupid!
 
If you have solved it by yourself you are not stupid. We all have a slow moments.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top