Calculating Cell Potential at 25oC with Cu2+ and NaOH

  • Thread starter Thread starter kooombaya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Potential
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the cell potential at 25°C for a copper electrode in solutions of varying concentrations of Cu2+ and NaOH. The initial potential for [Cu2+] = 5.1×10-10 M is determined to be 0.065 V. The second part involves using the Nernst equation to find the potential when the copper electrode is in a 0.270 M NaOH solution saturated with Cu(OH)2, with a Ksp of 1.6×10-19. The calculated potential using the Nernst equation is incorrectly stated as -0.64 V, leading to confusion regarding the incorporation of OH- concentration in the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Nernst equation
  • Knowledge of solubility product constant (Ksp)
  • Familiarity with electrochemical cell potentials
  • Basic concepts of dissociation in aqueous solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Nernst equation in detail, focusing on its application in electrochemistry
  • Learn about solubility product constants and their role in calculating ion concentrations
  • Research the behavior of copper hydroxide in alkaline solutions
  • Explore common mistakes in electrochemical calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, electrochemists, and anyone involved in analytical chemistry or studying electrochemical cells will benefit from this discussion.

kooombaya
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
What is the potential of this cell ( in V) at 25 oC if the copper electrode is placed in a solution in which [Cu2+] = 5.1×10-10 M?

I found this answer to be 0.065 which is correct. The second part:


If the copper electrode of the above cell is placed in a solution of 0.270 M NaOH that is saturated with Cu(OH)2, what is the potential of the cell (in V, measured in the same direction as in question 5) at 25 oC? Ksp = 1.6×10-19.

I'm using the Nernst equatuion.
Here's how I think it goes:
The NaOH is soluble so it dissolves but the Cu(OH)2 isn't. It's Ksp is very small but it will dissociate a little. So the dissociation equation I got is:

Cu(OH)2 ---> Cu2+ + 2OH-
Ksp = [Cu2+][OH-]^2
= [x][2x]^2
x = 3.42e-7

To find Ecell I said Cu gets oxidized and OH reduced and my Ecell = -0.74
Plugging into the Nernst equations:

E=-0.74-(0.0592/4)*log[Cu2+][OH-]^2
E=-0.64

This is wrong. Can someone explain to me please. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone please help me, or just give me a hint...
 
In the first part you have calculaed potential of the copper half cell, why do you try to incorporate OH- concentration into Nernst equation now? Were you told anything about change of the other half cell?

--
 
Ok, I have it set up as

Cu(OH)2 ---> Cu2+ + 2OH-

Ksp = 1.6e-19 = [x][2x+0.1]^2

Now this might sound stupid but how do I solve this equation. I'm stuck since we get an x^3 and x^2 term...
 
Sorry, I posted something else at first, but then realized you did something strange. Why 2x+0.1?

--
methods
 
2x+0.1 because of the .1 from the NaOH
 
Strange.

kooombaya said:
solution of 0.270 M NaOH

Is concentration of dissolved copper hydroxide comparable with concentration of NaOH?

--
methods
 
I mean 2x+0.27 this is from the answer key that the professor gave me. I don't know how to solve the equation though.
 
OK, 2x+0.27.

Can you answer the question I have asked?

--
methods
 
  • #10
From what I understood the 0.27 is from the NaOH that dissociates.
 
  • #11
That's not answer to the question I asked, to speed things up asnwer two questions now:

Is concentration of dissolved copper hydroxide comparable with concentration of NaOH?

Why 2x+0.27 for the OH- concentration?

And we won't move froward till you answer them both, so dodging won't help.

--
 
  • #12
I'm not trying to evade any question. Nevermind my chem exam is over, I don't feel like caring about it anymore... thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
6K