I Calculating Covariant Derivative of Riemann Tensor in Riemann Normal Coordinates

minits
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Covariant derivative of the Riemann tensor evaluated in Riemann normal coordinates
Hello everyone,

in equation 3.86 of this online version of Carroll´s lecture notes on general relativity (https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll3/Carroll3.html) the covariant derviative of the Riemann tensor is simply given by the partial derivative, the terms carrying the Christoffel symbols seem to vanish. I assume this results from the note that it is evaluated in Riemann normal coordinates. I know one can choose the coordinate system so that a given Christoffel-symbol vanishes but in this case there are so many to handle so that I am not convinced this is working. Can someone please give me an input on how to make myself clear that it works? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you be more specific. What doesn't seem to work? It looks perfectly fine.
 
minits said:
Summary:: Covariant derivative of the Riemann tensor evaluated in Riemann normal coordinates

Hello everyone,

in equation 3.86 of this online version of Carroll´s lecture notes on general relativity (https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll3/Carroll3.html) the covariant derviative of the Riemann tensor is simply given by the partial derivative, the terms carrying the Christoffel symbols seem to vanish. I assume this results from the note that it is evaluated in Riemann normal coordinates. I know one can choose the coordinate system so that a given Christoffel-symbol vanishes but in this case there are so many to handle so that I am not convinced this is working. Can someone please give me an input on how to make myself clear that it works? Thanks in advance!
Riemann normal coordinates are, by definition, coordinates in which at a specific point ##x_0## the metric is minkowskian and (all) the Christoffel symbols vanish.
Therefore covariant derivatives evaluated at this point ##x_0## are just ordinary derivatives.
 
Thanks for your answer! I thought in this case the Riemann tensor should vanish as well due to it´s definition in form of products and derivatives of Christoffel symbols but one will probably simply use the argument that tensors are independent of any basis.
 
minits said:
I thought in this case the Riemann tensor should vanish as well due to it´s definition in form of products and derivatives of Christoffel symbols
The Christoffel symbols vanish at the origin of Riemann normal coordinates, but their derivatives do not vanish at that point. So the Riemann tensor, since it includes derivatives of the Christoffel symbols, does not vanish at that point.
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM and Orodruin
Ah ok thanks for your answer!
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top