Calculating Diaphragm Plates Needed to Stop 30,000 lb Object

  • Thread starter Thread starter brambilah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plates
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of 1" welded diaphragm plates needed to stop a 30,000 lb object falling from a height of 90 ft. The potential energy and kinetic energy calculations yield a value of 3.24x10^4 kip*in, with an impact velocity of 76.101 ft/s. Initial calculations suggest that approximately 130 plates may be required, but this figure is questioned by participants who argue that the actual number is likely to be much lower, possibly 2 or 3 plates. Concerns are raised regarding the geometry of the setup and the need to consider the deformation of the plates and welds. Overall, the feasibility of the calculations and the assumptions made are debated, emphasizing the importance of practical applications in similar scenarios.
brambilah
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I Have an object with a mass of 30,000 lb falling at a height of 90ft. The object is to be stopped by a series of diaphragms spaced out 6" apart. I am using 1" welded plates as diaphrams. I need to find out how many plates it takes to stop the object. I have calculated my potential energy=kinetic energy to be 3.24x10^4 kip*in and the velocity at impact to be 76.101 ft*s^-1. Also each plate to have a weld capacity of 334 kip. I want to find out how many plates will the object shear before it stops.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


brambilah said:
I Have an object with a mass of 30,000 lb falling at a height of 90ft. The object is to be stopped by a series of diaphragms spaced out 6" apart. I am using 1" welded plates as diaphrams. I need to find out how many plates it takes to stop the object. I have calculated my potential energy=kinetic energy to be 3.24x10^4 kip*in and the velocity at impact to be 76.101 ft*s^-1. Also each plate to have a weld capacity of 334 kip. I want to find out how many plates will the object shear before it stops.

Holy smokes! Is this for an episode of MythBusters or something? :bugeye:
 


berkeman said:
Holy smokes! :bugeye:

It's' "only" a 13 ton truck doing 50 mph. That's not a ridiculous thing to contain with a few inches of mild steel.

But without knowing some more about the geometry of the situation, it's impossible to answer the question.
 


AlephZero said:
It's' "only" a 13 ton truck doing 50 mph. That's not a ridiculous thing to contain with a few inches of mild steel.

But without knowing some more about the geometry of the situation, it's impossible to answer the question.

What type of geometry do you need to know??
 


I used the conservation of momentum. I have initial momentum of ρi=M*a=70.959 kip*sec
*Vi=51.88mph
*Vf=0 mph
*m1=30,000 lb ======>mass of object
*m2=163 lb ======> mass of 2'x2' 1" plate
*t=1" =====>Thickness of diaphragm plate
*Δt= t/((Vi-Vf)/2) =====>Duration of Average impulse
*Δt= 2.19 x 10^-3 sec
*F=250 kip =====>Magnitude of Impulse(Chosen as a practical max.)
*ρ1=ρi-F*Δt =====>Momentum after first impact
*ρ1=70.411 kip*sec
*Δρ1= ρi-ρ1 ======>Change in momentum after first impact
*ρ1=0.548 kip*sec
*V1=ρ1/(m1+m2) ======>Velocity after first impact
*V1=75.105 ft*s^-1
*ΔV1=Vi-V1 ======>Reduction in velocity
*ΔV1=0.996 ft*s^-1

N=ρi/Δp1 =======>Plates required
N=129.6

Can someone verify that these calculations are feasible?
 


Go and look at some roadside crash barriers, then decide if "130" is a believable answer.

I would calculate how much of work you can do deforming one plate, before you either break the welds, or break the plate due to plastic deformation. Your projectile velocity is low so I don't think you need to worry about punching a "bullet hole" through the plate, or any other dynamic effects.

I would guess the answer is more than one plate (simply from the way the question is asked) but more llkely to be 2 or 3 plates, not 130.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top