Calculating Distance on an Inclined Plane with Friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a bundle sliding up an inclined plane with friction. The problem includes parameters such as mass, angle of incline, kinetic energy, and coefficient of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between energy, frictional forces, and potential energy on an incline. Questions arise regarding the correct application of trigonometric functions in calculating forces and energy changes.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the assumptions made in the original poster's calculations, particularly regarding the setup of forces and the use of sine and cosine functions. Some participants offer insights into the nature of frictional forces on inclined planes and the implications of angle measurement.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential misunderstandings related to the definitions of forces acting on the bundle and the geometry of the inclined plane. The discussion reflects a need for clarity on how to properly account for gravitational and frictional forces in the context of energy conservation.

NAkid
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] inclined plane problem

Homework Statement


A 3.4kg bundle starts up a 30o incline with 198J of kinetic energy. How far will it slide up the plane if the coefficient of friction is 0.26?


Homework Equations


Work(total)=.5mv(final)^2 - .5mv(initial)^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I set up a FBD for work(friction and work(gravity) to calculate work(total)=k2=k1
work(friction)=-ukmgsin(theta)=-4.3s (s=displacement)
work(gravity)=-mgs=-33.32s (s=displacement)
work(total)=-37.65s=k2-k1
k2=.5mv(final)^2=0 because vf=0
k1=198J
so s=198/37.65 --- but that's not the right answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is force * distance.
What is the frictional force parralel to the surface the block slides on?

Then account for the potential energy added to the block.
 
mgb_phys said:
Energy is force * distance.
What is the frictional force parralel to the surface the block slides on?

Then account for the potential energy added to the block.


well, frictional force is -ukmgsin(theta) right?
 
i guess my question is, what is wrong with my logic?
 
Have you drawn a force diagram? Are you sure about the sin()?
Rather than try and memorise formula think what happens - if the incline is almost level is the friction highest or lowest, does the frictional force get larger or smaller as the incline goes to vertical?
 
mgb_phys said:
Have you drawn a force diagram? Are you sure about the sin()?
Rather than try and memorise formula think what happens - if the incline is almost level is the friction highest or lowest, does the frictional force get larger or smaller as the incline goes to vertical?

i guess that depends on whether it's a sin or a cos. if it's sin the frictional force should get higher as the incline goes to vertical, because the sin(theta)-->1 towards the vertical, but lower if cos because cos(theta)--> 0 towards the vertical.
 
and with that, it's supposed to be -ukmgcos(theta)
 
which still doesn't yield the right answer
 
The angle of an inclined plane is normally measured from the horizontal - which by similair triangles is also the angle between the normal force on the object and vertical.
Since the normal force is the full weight when the plane is horizontal then the term must be cos() since sin(0)=0.

So you have a resistance to movement of ukmgcos(theta) together with a distance along the plane which gives you energy.
There is also a vertical distance = length*sin(theta) so you have a potential energy gain.
 
  • #10
mgb_phys said:
The angle of an inclined plane is normally measured from the horizontal - which by similair triangles is also the angle between the normal force on the object and vertical.
Since the normal force is the full weight when the plane is horizontal then the term must be cos() since sin(0)=0.

So you have a resistance to movement of ukmgcos(theta) together with a distance along the plane which gives you energy.
There is also a vertical distance = length*sin(theta) so you have a potential energy gain.

ah of course - my W(grav) set up was wrong, it should be -mgsin(theta)*s

thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K