Calculating divergence using covariant derivative

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of divergence using the covariant derivative in the context of differential geometry. The original poster attempts to prove a relationship involving the divergence of a vector field and the Levi-Civita connection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of divergence and the use of the Levi-Civita connection. There are attempts to clarify the role of the volume element and the contraction operator. Questions arise regarding the use of orthonormal bases and the implications for the connection.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the correct form of the volume element and raise concerns about the assumptions made regarding the basis. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's oversight regarding the determinant of the Riemannian metric, and the discussion explores the implications of using an orthonormal basis.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the square root of the determinant of the metric in the divergence calculation and question the validity of using orthonormal bases in this context. The discussion reflects on the potential differences in connections when changing bases.

v2536
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the definition of divergence d(i_{X}dV) = (div X)dV where X:M\rightarrow TM is a vector field, dV is a volume element and i_X is a contraction operator e.g. i_{X}T = X^{k}T^{i_{1}...i_{r}}_{kj_{2}...j_{s}}, prove that if we use Levi-Civita connection then the divergence can also be written as
div X = X^{i}_{;i}

2. The attempt at a solution

This is what i tried:
since dV = dx^{1} \wedge ... \wedge dx^{n}
after some calculation i conclude that i_{X}dV = \sum_{i=1}^{n}(-1)^{i}X_{i}dx^{1} \wedge ... \wedge dx^{i-1} \wedge dx^{i+1} \wedge ... \wedge dx^{n}
so d(i_{X} dV) = (\partial _{i}X^{i})dV
Then i attempt the use the fact that \Gamma^{i}_{jk} = \Gamma^{i}_{kj} to get a lot of cancellation and show that \partial _{i}X^{i} = X^{i}_{;i}
but i couldn't.
So can anyone please help? Thx in advanced :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey v2536 and welcome to the forums.

I don't know much about differential geometry, but I do understand in essence what you are trying to do.

Maybe you should look at this website (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergence#Generalizations). A lot of the results you need are found in the coordinate free form you are trying to prove.
 
Your first step is wrong. You should have

dV = \sqrt{g} \, dx^1 \wedge \ldots \wedge dx^n
where \sqrt{g} is the square root of the determinant of the Riemannian metric.
 
Thank you chiro and Ben for your reply :)
I see that i forgot about \sqrt{g} in front but can't i always find an orthonormal basis and work in that?
and by doing that g should become 1 right?
 
ok i think i understand now, if i use orthonormal basis then the connection may no be Levis-Civita.
 
If you use an orthonormal basis, then your basis 1-forms are not necessarily closed (so it would be incorrect to write them as dx).
 
yes. that make sense.
Now i got the solution, thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K