Calculating eletric potential using line integral of electric field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating electric potential using the line integral of the electric field. The user correctly identifies the electric field at point P as $$ E = \frac {k Q} {D^2-0.25*l^2} $$ but encounters issues when integrating to find the potential. The integral $$ V_P = \int_D^{\infty} \frac {k Q} {r^2-0.25*l^2} \, dr$$ does not yield the expected result. The correct approach involves using $$ V = k \lambda \ln \frac {D+\frac{l}{2}} {D-\frac{l}{2}}$$, derived from integrating $$ dv = k \lambda \frac {dx}{x}$$ over the appropriate limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potentials
  • Familiarity with line integrals in vector calculus
  • Knowledge of the logarithmic function in mathematical expressions
  • Experience with integral calculus and its applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of electric potential and its relation to electric fields
  • Learn about line integrals and their applications in physics
  • Explore the use of integral calculators for verifying complex integrals
  • Investigate the differences between various forms of potential energy equations in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to electric potential and field calculations.

pedromatias
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A bar of length l has charge Q that is linearly distributed, with constant charge density λ. There is a point P at distance D from the center of mass of the bar, and P is in the same axis as the bar. Knowing the electric field, calculate the electric potential at P using a line integral. See figure.
Relevant Equations
The difference of potential between two points is symmetric to the line integral between those two points of the dot product between the electric field and the line.
So, I am able to calculate the electric potential in another way but I know that this way is supposed to work as well, but I don't get the correct result.

I calculated the electric field at P in the previous exercise and its absolute value is $$ E = \frac {k Q} {D^2-0.25*l^2} $$ This is correct as per the solution. From the figure, we can see that the direction of the electric field at P is that of the negative x direction.

So, to calculate the electric potential I took advantage of the fact that at infinite the potential is zero and did

$$ V_P = \int_D^{\infty} \frac {k Q} {r^2-0.25*l^2} \, dr$$

However, this integral does not give the correct result. I inserted it into integral calculator and the result was not the correct one, which is

$$ k \lambda \ln \frac {D+\frac{l}{2}} {D-\frac{l}{2}}$$

I don't understand what I am doing incorrectly. My reasoning is that I have the expression for the Electric field in a point at a distance ##r## in the axis of ##P##, and that Electric field points in the same direction as the straight line path from ##P## to ##\infty##, so the dot product is the magnitude of the electric field.

The way I solved it correctly and which gives me the right solution is, where ##x## is the distance from P,

$$ dv = k \frac {dq}{x}$$
$$ dv = k \lambda \frac {dx}{x}$$
$$ V = \int_{D-0.5l}^{D+0.5l} \frac {k \lambda} {x} \, dx $$
$$ V = k \lambda \ln \frac {D+\frac{l}{2}} {D-\frac{l}{2}}$$
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (130).png
    Screenshot (130).png
    15.3 KB · Views: 149
Physics news on Phys.org
What result does your calculator give? How have you verified that it is different from the one you got? Sometimes solutions given by calculators look different but aren't.
 
  • Like
Likes pedromatias and vela
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
979
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
885
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K