Calculating Energy Conservation in a Spring-Mass System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating energy conservation in a spring-mass system. When the spring is compressed, the total energy is correctly represented as the sum of elastic potential energy (1/2 kx^2) and gravitational potential energy (mgh). Upon release, as the spring passes the edge of the table with constant horizontal velocity, the total energy includes both kinetic energy (1/2 mVx^2) and gravitational potential energy (mgh). The gravitational potential energy remains constant during the motion, allowing the equation to simplify to 1/2 mVx^2 = 1/2 kx^2. The kinetic energy is indeed half the mass times the square of the horizontal velocity.
Pseudo Statistic
Messages
391
Reaction score
6
In the attached picture below I am compressing a spring...
In picture 2, I've compressed the spring a distance x and thus the elastic potential is 1/2 kx^2 and the total energy in the system AT THAT POINT is 1/2 kx^2 + mgh, isn't it? (m is the mass of the ball and h the height from my reference level, the floor) Or am I wrong in thinking this?
Assuming energy conservation, let's say I let go of the spring and it's at that point where it has JUST gone over the edge of the table with its constant horizontal velocity Vx; would the total energy at that point be equal to 1/2 mVx^2 (where m is the mass of the ball) or would I be wrong in assuming this?
Thanks for any help.
 

Attachments

  • springthing.jpg
    springthing.jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 456
Physics news on Phys.org
Pseudo Statistic said:
In the attached picture below I am compressing a spring...
In picture 2, I've compressed the spring a distance x and thus the elastic potential is 1/2 kx^2 and the total energy in the system AT THAT POINT is 1/2 kx^2 + mgh, isn't it? (m is the mass of the ball and h the height from my reference level, the floor) Or am I wrong in thinking this?
Your thinking seems correct. That would be the total mechanical energy of the ball/spring/earth system.

Assuming energy conservation, let's say I let go of the spring and it's at that point where it has JUST gone over the edge of the table with its constant horizontal velocity Vx; would the total energy at that point be equal to 1/2 mVx^2 (where m is the mass of the ball) or would I be wrong in assuming this?
You forgot the gravitational PE (mgh). The total mechanical energy at that point would be its KE + mgh.
 
Alright so, the mghs in the equality would cancel out leaving us with 1/2mv^2 = 1/2 kx^2, wouldn't it?
Thanks for the reply.
 
That's right. The spring PE is transformed into KE. (Since the height never changes, the gravitational PE remains constant.)
 
Alright, thanks, but one more thing...
The kinetic energy would be equal to half of the mass times by the constant horizontal velocity the ball would experience when under projectile motion squared, correct?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top