Calculating Energy of Two Masses on a Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter bessletama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy of a macroscopic oscillator consisting of two equal masses attached to a spring, oscillating in a frictionless environment. The initial assumption is that the masses are at either end of the spring, with their motion described by a cosine curve. The participant derives the velocity and proposes an energy calculation based on one mass's motion, but is advised to consider the relative motion of both masses. It's suggested that simplifying the problem is possible if the masses move antisymmetrically with the same amplitude. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately modeling the system to derive the correct energy expression.
bessletama
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the following macroscopic oscillator: Two masses of equal mass are attached to a spring and oscillate with amplitude A at frequency v. Use classical physics to calculate the energy of the oscillator.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


This question doesn't say much about where the mass is attached or what environment this oscillator is in so I assumed that we're in a friction-less environment and the mass is attached on either end of the spring. Please tell me if that is incorrect.
Based on that assumption, I know that the position of one of the mass would travel in a cosine curve. So we have p(t)=A*cos(2*pi*v*x). I can take the derivative of this to get the velocity v(t)=-2*pi*A*v*sin(2*pi*v*x). The maximum velocity is when t=1/(4v). Let's call this new velocity V. Now the energy of the spring should be 2*((1/2)*m*V^2). Is this correct? Or is there another way to do it.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assumed that we're in a friction-less environment and the mass is attached on either end of the spring. Please tell me if that is incorrect.
You should verify the assumption ... but it is what I'd do.

What you seem to have done is considered the motion of just one mass, assuming the other one is stationary.

The force on the masses depends on their relative positions - so you'd work out the free body diagram and solve the resulting differential equation.

If their motion is antisymmetric with the same amplitude, then you can simplify the problem quite a lot.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top