Calculating Fluid Displacement in a Multi-Fluid System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating fluid displacement for a block of wood floating in a jar of water with oil poured on top. The key challenge is determining the mass of the fluid displaced when two fluids of different densities are involved, without knowing the jar's dimensions. The block's shape and volume are crucial, as they influence buoyancy calculations, particularly when considering how much of the block is submerged. The block is confirmed to be a cube with a volume of 0.001 m^3, leading to a mass of 0.5 kg, which implies it would be 50% submerged in water alone. The participants clarify the dimensions and properties of the block to resolve the displacement calculation.
thunderbug
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i seem to be stuck on a problem which involves fluids of 2 different densities, and an object floating in/on them. A block of wood is floating in a jar of water. oil is then poured onto the water. how can i calculate the mass of "the fluid displaced" when it is composed of 2 different fluids, and i have no idea how large the jar is? i don't think i should average their densities, but i keep getting a wrong result.

for a floating (partially submerged) object, i can see that
FB = mg = (fraction submerged) (weight of fluid displaced by entire object)

= (fraction) (rho of fluid * Volume of object * g)

i have used this to find the fraction of an object which is above or below the surface. how can i change it to apply to 2 fluids with 2 different densities?

the specifics given:
rho(wood) = 500 kg/m^3
rho(oil) = 600 kg/m^3
v(wood) = (.01m)^3
question asks how deep oil layer is when it is 4 cm below the top of the block.[/CODE]
PHP:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not an engineering whiz, but isn't the shape of the block an essential element? Normally, the shape would be irrelevant, since bouyancy acts on the volume/mass, and is independent of shape. But you need to know when it is 4cm out of the water - a linear measurement.

If the block were 1 cm^2 and 1m tall, you would have a very different answer than if it were 100cm^2 and 5cm tall.

Do we assume it is a cube?


Also, when you say the block of wood has a volume of (.01m)^3, I can interpret that two ways:
.01m is equal to 1cm; 1cm^3 is 1 cubic cm
or
.01m^3 could be read as 1/100th of a cubic meter; which is 10000 cubic cm.


Something tells me this isn't about decimals. I'm going to assume the block is a cube.

I'm also going to go out on a limb and propose that the cube is not supposed to be .01m^3 (this would make the cube 21.544379972138894748806069367288cm on a side).
Nor it is supposed to be 1cm^3, since it could never float 4cm out of the water.

I'm going to say the cube is supposed to be 0.001m^3 - making it 10 cm on a side (and incidentally having a volume of 1 liter and a mass of 0.5kg).
 
Last edited:
sorry if i was unclear, yes, the block is .01m per side, and a cube. and yes, the mass would be 0.5 kg. am i correct in saying that if this block were floating only on the water, that it would be submerged 50% ?
 
wow. sorry. 0.1 m per side, yes 10 cm per side, etc.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top