Calculating Footfall Induced Vibration: Troubleshooting and Tips

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LMW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induced Vibration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on troubleshooting footfall induced vibration calculations, specifically comparing results from a user's calculations to those presented in the "Design Guide for Footfall Analysis" on page 44. The user reports a calculated value of 0.000726, while the guide indicates a value of 5.79E-04. Key issues identified include a misunderstanding of the calculation for the parameter ##\mu## and a potential misapplication of the damping ratio ##\zeta_m##, which should be set at 1.5% instead of 0.9%. These factors contribute to the discrepancies in the results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of footfall induced vibration principles
  • Familiarity with the "Design Guide for Footfall Analysis"
  • Knowledge of vibration parameters such as ##\mu## and ##\zeta_m##
  • Basic mathematical skills for vibration calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the "Design Guide for Footfall Analysis" for detailed methodologies
  • Study the calculation of the parameter ##\mu## in footfall analysis
  • Investigate the implications of varying the damping ratio ##\zeta_m## in vibration calculations
  • Explore software tools for simulating footfall induced vibrations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, architects, and vibration analysts involved in structural design and performance assessment, particularly those focused on footfall induced vibrations in buildings.

LMW
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find real responde mode 1
Relevant Equations
How to find the same results as in the book
Hey guys. Im about to learn about footfall induced vibration. However i want to reach the same results as in the pdf page 44 ''design guide for footfall analysis''

i get 0.000726 while they get 5,79E-0,4.

Can anyone help me figure out what im going wrong and where i have made a mistake?

 

Attachments

  • calculations.pdf
    calculations.pdf
    470.2 KB · Views: 171
  • the result i want to attain.PNG
    the result i want to attain.PNG
    25.8 KB · Views: 133
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I get how to calculate the ##\mu##. Otherwise, the only error I can find in your calculation is that ##\zeta_m## should be 1.5%, not 0.9%, but this is not sufficient to explain the discrepancy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K