MHB Calculating Geometric Probability on a Round Table

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the geometric probability of a coin landing entirely within a smaller circle on a round table. The original poster calculated the probability as 81/2500, considering the area of the large circle as the sample space and adjusting the area of the small circle to account for the coin's radius. However, other participants pointed out that the correct approach should factor in the coin's radius, leading to a different probability calculation. The correct probability should be based on the adjusted areas, resulting in a final answer of (9/49)^2. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the dimensions involved in geometric probability problems.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have a question related to geometric probability. I think I solved it, but not sure, would appreciate your opinion.

We are given a round table with a radius of 50cm. At the center of this table there is another circle, with a radius of 10cm. A coin with a radius of 1cm is thrown on the table. Assuming that it landed on the table, what is the probability that the coin (the entire coin) is within the small circle ?

I said that the area of the big circle is

\[2500\pi\]

this is the sample space.

The set of the required event is the points creating the area of the small circle, but going 1cm inside, to allow the entire coin to be inside, so it is:

\[81\pi\]

Therefore the probability is:

\[\frac{81}{2500}\]

Am I correct ?

Thank you !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would be inclined to say:

$$P(x)=\frac{\pi\left(10-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)^2}{\pi\left(50-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)^2}=\left(\frac{19}{99}\right)^2$$
 
Not sure where Mark's $\dfrac12$ is coming from. The question says that the radius (not the diameter!) of the coin is 1cm. So I would give the answer as $\left(\dfrac9{49}\right)^2$. This assumes that the coin has to land so that it is entirely on the table. The OP's answer $\dfrac{81}{2500}$ assumes that it is allowed to land so that it precariously overlaps the edge of the table.
 
Yes, I misread radius as diameter...oops. :)
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K