Calculating Gravity on a Person Inside a Building

  • Thread starter Thread starter Einstein2nd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational force acting on a person inside a building, particularly considering different positions within the structure. When standing in the center of a uniformly distributed mass building, the net gravitational force is assumed to be zero due to cancellation of forces. However, if positioned at the edge, the gravitational effect from the building must be considered, with the approximation that the building's mass can be treated as concentrated at its center. The conversation also touches on tidal forces, suggesting that even in a simple one-story building, these forces could create a differential pull on the person, potentially leading to a stretching effect. Overall, the calculations involve using gravitational equations and assumptions about mass distribution to estimate forces accurately.
Einstein2nd
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've posted this in the homework section but really, it was asked by a young kid who had just been learning about gravity in high school science. It made my realize that I wasn't able to provide a superb answer.

So, you have a man standing inside a building, what is the gravitational force on him? Of course we are only talking about estimates and ball park figures here. If he were standing right in the middle of the building, and it had an evenly distributed mass, then it would be right to assume that the net gravitational force would be zero since it would all cancel?

What about if the person were right on the left edge of the building? I have so little idea about weights of buildings that I'm struggling to even think of a ball park figure.


Homework Equations



I have a hunch that F = Gm1m2/r2 will come into it...

The Attempt at a Solution



Right now I am thinking that "on average, the net gravitational force will be zero because the forces in each direction will all cancel out" but that sounds a bit unsatisfactory?

Cheers in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Einstein2nd! :smile:
Einstein2nd said:
If he were standing right in the middle of the building, and it had an evenly distributed mass, then it would be right to assume that the net gravitational force would be zero since it would all cancel?

Yes. :smile:
What about if the person were right on the left edge of the building? I have so little idea about weights of buildings that I'm struggling to even think of a ball park figure.

A building weighs about the same as a ball park. :wink:
I have a hunch that F = Gm1m2/r2 will come into it...
You may as well assume that the whole mass of the huilding is concentrated at its centre.

If the distance to the centre of the building, and to the centre of the Earth, are r and R,

and if the mass of the building, and of the Earth, are m and M,

then the extra gravitational acceleration from the building wil be g times m/M times R2/r2 :smile:
 


Yeah that seems like sound logic. For my own curiosity, what about tidal forces? If you were standing in the middle of the building there could still be tidal forces?

To make things simpler, assume it is a 1 storey building. Then perhaps divide the mass into 4 and assume that the forces are equal in all directions (as said before, so the net force on the person is zero).

Take a person to be a 70kg, 1.7 metre sphere :p Consider the force in say the north direction, due to 1/4 of the building's mass, to be concentrated half way between the person (in the middle) and the edge of the building. I guess you could then calculate the difference in force on the near and far side of the sphere and that's the tidal force. This would be repeated 3 times and you would see that the person is actually being pulled apart! Maybe take into account only 60% of the human's body being water?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top