Calculating Height from Work and Rotational Motion of a Rigid Body

  • Thread starter Thread starter GoldShadow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Rigid body
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the height a wheel reaches after rolling up a hill, given its weight of 392 N, an initial rotational speed of 25.0 rad/s, and a radius of 0.600 m. The moment of inertia is defined as 0.800MR², leading to a total work done against friction of 3500 J. The correct height calculation, accounting for both rotational and translational kinetic energy, yields a final height of 11.7 m, correcting the initial miscalculation of 18.1 m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational motion and moment of inertia (I = cMR²)
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy equations for both rotational and translational motion
  • Familiarity with work-energy principles in physics
  • Basic algebra for solving equations involving multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of rotational kinetic energy and its relation to moment of inertia
  • Learn about the work-energy theorem and its applications in non-conservative systems
  • Explore the relationship between angular velocity and linear velocity (v = ωR)
  • Investigate the role of friction in rolling motion and its impact on energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of energy conservation and work in rotational motion scenarios.

GoldShadow
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 392-N wheel comes off a moving truck and rolls without slipping along a highway. At the bottom of a hill it is rotating at 25.0 rad/s. The radius of the wheel is 0.600 m and its moment of inertia about its rotation axis is 0.800MR^2. Friction does work on the wheel as it rolls up the hill to a stop, a height h above the bottom of the hill; this work has absolute value 3500 J. Calculate h.

Mass "M" = w/g = 392/9.8, or 40 kg.

Homework Equations


I=cMR^{2}

W_{total}=\Delta K - W_{friction}= \frac{1}{2}I \omega^{2}_{final}-\frac{1}{2}I \omega^{2}_{initial}-W_{friction}

W_{total}=-\Delta U=Mgh_{initial}-Mgh_{final}

The Attempt at a Solution


I set the two equations for Work equal to get:

Mgh_{initial}-Mgh_{final}=\frac{1}{2}I \omega^{2}_{final}-\frac{1}{2}I \omega^{2}_{initial}-W_{friction}

Since initial height is 0 and final angular velocity is 0, this simplifies to:

-Mgh_{final}=-\frac{1}{2}I \omega^{2}_{initial}-W_{friction}

Multiplying this equation by -1 to make the negatives a little more friendly and writing out "I" (moment of inertia) yields:Mgh_{final}=\frac{1}{2}cMR^{2} \omega^{2}_{initial}+W_{friction}

Isolating to solve for "h":

\frac{(\frac{1}{2}cMR^{2} \omega^{2}_{initial}+W_{friction})}{Mg}=h_{final}

Plugging in numbers:

\frac{(\frac{1}{2}(0.800)(40)(0.600)^{2} (25.0)^{2}+3500)}{(40)(9.80)}=h_{final}

For h I get 18.1 m, but the answer according to the book is 11.7 m.

I tried several approaches and couldn't get the right answer, so I would appreciate help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have an equation where energy is not conserved, which is good, but it's missing two major things. You take the rotational kinetic energy of the wheel into account, but you leave out the wheel's translational kinetic energy. Additionally, you're assuming that the friction does negative work on the wheel. Think about which way the friction points along the hill.
 
Ah, okay, I get it now. Since there is both rotational and translational motion, \Delta K should include both types of kinetic energy. And work due to friction is positive because it acts in such a direction that makes angular velocity positive? So my new equation would be:

-Mgh_{final}=-\frac{1}{2}I \omega^{2}_{initial}-\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}_{initial}+W_{friction}.

And knowing that v=\omega R, plug in numbers to get h=11.7 m.

Thank you very much hotcommodity, this problem was really frustrating me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
835
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K