Calculating height given pressures and temperatures

  • Thread starter Thread starter e.pramudita
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the altitude of an airplane based on given pressures and temperatures, utilizing principles from atmospheric physics. Participants explore various equations and assumptions related to temperature and pressure conversions, as well as the implications of using different units in calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a derived equation for pressure change with altitude but questions the absence of molecular weight (M) in the provided solution.
  • Another participant suggests that while temperature is assumed to be linear for approximation, it is not strictly linear in reality.
  • Participants discuss the origin of specific values used in calculations, such as the constants a=530 and b=-24/h, with one explaining that these are chosen for temperature conversions in Fahrenheit.
  • There is a challenge regarding the calculation of altitude (h), with one participant asserting that all variables except h are known in the final equation.
  • Confusion arises over unit conversions, particularly between Fahrenheit and Rankine, with one participant questioning the validity of logarithmic comparisons between temperatures in different units.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of using absolute temperatures in calculations, noting that ratios of temperatures should not be expressed in degrees Fahrenheit.
  • Discrepancies in calculated altitudes are highlighted, with one participant noting a significant difference between their result and the provided solution, prompting further discussion on the accuracy of unit conversions and assumptions made.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of certain assumptions and calculations, particularly regarding unit conversions and the treatment of temperature. There is no consensus on the correct approach to resolving the discrepancies in altitude calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their calculations, including potential errors in unit conversions and the need for consistent use of absolute temperature scales. The discussion also acknowledges that atmospheric conditions can vary significantly, which may affect the accuracy of the calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals interested in atmospheric physics, engineering, or anyone dealing with calculations involving pressure and temperature in flight dynamics.

e.pramudita
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On a certain day the barometric pressure at sea level is 30.1in.Hg, and the temperature is 70°F. The pressure gage in an airplane in flight indicates a pressure of 10.6psia, and the temperature gage shows the air temperature to be 46°F. Estimate as accurately as possible the altitude of the airplane above sea level.

Homework Equations


Here is the solution
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63664351/MATS2005/Capture2.PNG

The Attempt at a Solution


https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63664351/MATS2005/Capture.PNG

Problems:
1. I derived \frac{dP}{dy} = -\frac{PM}{RT} g But on the given solution there is no M. How come?
2. Why is T linear?
3. Where it gets a=530 and b=-24/h
4. Where it gets h=9192ft?
Given P=10.6psia, P_0=30.1in.Hg and we know 29.92in.Hg=14.7psia=1atm
then P_0=30.1*14.7/29.92=14.78843583psia
\ln \frac{10.6}{14.78843583}=-0.3329915114
\ln \frac{506}{530}=-0.04634033726
\frac{g}{24*R}=0.04914629473
h = 146.2120585 \text{m}= 480 \text{ft}

If you have different approach (except ISA), please do share.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
But on the given solution there is no M. How come?
The atmosphere has 80% nitrogen (mainly molecules with 2 N16-atoms), 20% oxygen (mainly molecules with 2 O16-atoms) and negligible traces of other gases.
You can use the relative pressure to avoid this.

2. Why is T linear?
It is not, but that assumption will give a reasonable approximation.

3. Where it gets a=530 and b=-24/h
Chosen to get T(0)=530 ("Fahrenheit above absolute zero"? US-units are weird) and T(airplane)=530+24.

4. Where it gets h=9192ft?
In the last equation, everything apart from h is known, you can solve it for h.
 
Ambient Temperature = 70 F
Converting F to Rankine scale (where Abs. Zero = -460 F)
then T = 70 + 460 = 530 F
 
The quantity:

\frac{g}{24*R}=0.04914629473

You did not calculate this in consistent units. You were right about the M. The R in this equation needs to be divided by a factor of M. The R that should be used here is

R = \frac{8.31}{29}\frac{J}{(K)(gm)}

You also need to multiply by 1000 to convert the Joules in the numerator from kg to grams.

You also need to divide the 24 F by 1.8 to get degrees K. Once you make these corrections, you should get the right answer. This punctuates the need to pay careful attention to units when you solve a problem.
 
Last edited:
Thanks you all for your responses!
Still confused with conversion.
For example
\ln \frac{46°F}{70°F} ≠ \ln \frac{506°R}{530°R}
If the units inside ln are the same, then the number inside ln is without unit (the units cancel each other).
Thus how come the calculations above are not equal?
What unit should I use then? And how come unit that you're suggesting work?

Following attachment is my calculations. I calculate it as precise as possible and round it only on my final answer. That being said mine differ significantly.
Solution = 2801.722 m
Mine = 2686.85 m
Difference about 200 m is unacceptable, don't you think?
And by International Standard Atmosphere that says
T = a - 0.0065y y_p= \frac{280.927778K - 294.261111K}{-0.0065} = 2051.282 \text{m}
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63664351/MATS2005/units.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
e.pramudita said:
Thanks you all for your responses!
Still confused with conversion.
For example
\ln \frac{46°F}{70°F} ≠ \ln \frac{506°R}{530°R}
If the units inside ln are the same, then the number inside ln is without unit (the units cancel each other).
Thus how come the calculations above are not equal?
What unit should I use then? And how come unit that you're suggesting work?

Following attachment is my calculations. I calculate it as precise as possible and round it only on my final answer. That being said mine differ significantly.
Solution = 2801.722 m
Mine = 2686.85 m
Difference about 200 m is unacceptable, don't you think?
And by International Standard Atmosphere that says
T = a - 0.0065y y_p= \frac{280.927778K - 294.261111K}{-0.0065} = 2051.282 \text{m}
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63664351/MATS2005/units.png

You are very close now. First of all, you can't express the ratio of the temperatures in degrees F, because the ideal gas law calls the temperatures to be absolute temperatures (R or K), not temperatures relative to some arbitrary reference (F or C). Secondly, you made a mistake in arithmetic: the 23 should be a 24 (like you correctly obtained when you did the problem the first time). See what you get when you make this correction.

Finally, the temperature profile for the atmosphere changes from day to day, hour to hour, minute to minute, etc. The International Standard Atmosphere is an approximate average over time, and over the surface of the earth. Your problem, on the other hand, gives the temperature and pressure profiles at a specific location and time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K