Calculating Impact Force of a Schmidt Hammer

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the impact force of a Schmidt hammer involves understanding the relationship between impact energy and rebound values, which reflect the energy lost during the inelastic collision. Without the impulse contact time or stopping distance, determining the exact impact force is challenging. The change in energy can be analyzed, but additional details like the rebound momentum may provide insights into the force calculation. Users are encouraged to share any new findings or rephrase their questions for clarity to facilitate better responses. Accurate calculations may require further information or assumptions about the system's dynamics.
tetherballninja
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi! I have apparently forgotten way too much college physics, and could really use some help here. I'm trying to calculate the impact force of an instrument (a Schmidt hammer--uses a spring-loaded piston) that produces an impulse against a surface. The instrument registers a rebound value (which I believe is a measure of rebound energy), and I know the impact energy. I don't have the impulse contact time, or the stopping distance, but both are very small (think very stiff spring-loaded metal piston slamming into a cement wall).

So the question is, given only a change in energy (I don't think it matters if you think of it as spring potential, or kinetic just before impact) during an inelastic collision--plus any other information I may be overlooking that can be gleaned from the "rebound" (momentum?)--is there any way to calculate the impact force?

Thanks in advance for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top