Calculating Latent Heat of Vaporisation: 3 kW Kettle, 2.0 kg Water @ 100oC

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the latent heat of vaporization for water using a 3 kW kettle and 2.0 kg of water at approximately 100°C. Participants are exploring the relationship between energy, mass, and latent heat, specifically questioning the conversion of units and the use of powers of ten in calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion regarding the conversion of latent heat from kJ to J and the significance of the powers of ten in their calculations. They question why their teacher used 2256 x 10^3 and how it relates to the final answer in megajoules (MJ). Others discuss the absence of certain prefixes in different energy calculations and the rationale behind using specific units.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on unit conversions and the reasoning behind using certain prefixes. Some have provided explanations regarding standard prefixes and the conventions used in expressing energy values, but there is still uncertainty among participants about the application of these concepts in their specific problems.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework rules that may limit the depth of explanation provided. There is a focus on understanding the underlying principles rather than arriving at a final answer.

luigihs
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
A 3 kW kettle contains 2.0 kg of water at a temperature close to 100oC.


Latent heat of vaporisation for water: Lv=2256 (kJ kg^-1)

Q= Lv x mass



Ok I understand this problem because I now the answer but I don't understand the process.

Like my teacher wrote 2256x10^3 why he wrote 10^3 ?? I don't understand ! .. so he plugged into the equation and he get 2256x10^3 x 1.5kg = the first answer is 3.38x10^6 J But again I understand why he wrote 10^6? what's the point ... because If put in my calculator 2256 x 1.5 = 3384 ... , and the final answer is 3.38 MJ what happen to the 10^6 ?? why he convert to MJ I really confused help me please!
Thank you..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
luigihs said:
A 3 kW kettle contains 2.0 kg of water at a temperature close to 100oC.


Latent heat of vaporisation for water: Lv=2256 (kJ kg^-1)

Q= Lv x mass



Ok I understand this problem because I now the answer but I don't understand the process.

Like my teacher wrote 2256x10^3 why he wrote 10^3 ?? I don't understand ! .. so he plugged into the equation and he get 2256x10^3 x 1.5kg = the first answer is 3.38x10^6 J But again I understand why he wrote 10^6? what's the point ... because If put in my calculator 2256 x 1.5 = 3384 ... , and the final answer is 3.38 MJ what happen to the 10^6 ?? why he convert to MJ I really confused help me please!
Thank you..

Unit prefixes and powers of ten: read here
 
gneill said:
Unit prefixes and powers of ten: read here

Cheers but I still struggling how can i get 3.38x10^6
 
MJ = megaJoules = 106 Joules
 
gneill said:
MJ = megaJoules = 106 Joules


Ok but that doesn't make sense because I have another problem with the same type of answer
E =1.5kg * 4190 J kg-1 K-1 x 85o = 5.34*10^5 J = 534 kJ. and there is no 10^5 in the decimal prefixes ...
 
534 kJ = 534 x 103 J = 5.34 x 10^5 J

The reason it was specified as 534 kJ is because there's no 105 prefix.

Standard prefixes are for powers that are multiples of three (kilo and above).
 
gneill said:
534 kJ = 534 x 103 J = 5.34 x 10^5 J

The reason it was specified as 534 kJ is because there's no 105 prefix.

Standard prefixes are for powers that are multiples of three (kilo and above).

So the answer is in Kj because is 10^5 and is between 10^5 and 10^3 ??
 
luigihs said:
So the answer is in Kj because is 10^5 and is between 10^5 and 10^3 ??

Essentially, yes.

Sometimes you'll see values like 0.341 kJ or 1500 MW where the convention is "bent" a bit. Usually this is done to make the particular number have common units with other like-values for comparison (like entries in a table of values), or where one particular prefix would not handle all of the values to be shown.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
15K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
4K