Calculating ln2 with Maclaurian Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
Calculators do not typically compute ln2 using Maclaurin series; instead, they employ a variety of numerical algorithms. While some users may assume calculators use series expansions for functions like logarithms, this is not the case. The discussion highlights a misunderstanding about calculator operations and emphasizes the importance of understanding mathematical principles without relying solely on technology. A participant expresses a desire to find more information on the algorithms used by calculators. Overall, the conversation centers on the methods calculators use to compute logarithmic values.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
so when i type ln2 into my calculator does it compute ln2 using a maclaurian series?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yes, very likely. but why are you using a calculator :P
 
im not , i just want to know how the calculator comes up with the answer.
 
When you do mathematics you don't use calculators.
 
cragar, sorry for the rather silly answers you have got. No, calculator (and computers) do NOT typically use MacLaurin seiries for trig functions, exponentials, etc. I thought they did for a long time, then ran across a website that talked about a general class of numerical algorighms that are used for that. I had bookmarked the site but that was years (and a couple of computers ago) and I can't find it now. I will continue looking.
 
o thanks
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Back
Top