Calculating Mass of Hanging Block on Inclined Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter stumper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Mass
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 2kg block on a 37-degree inclined plane connected to a hanging block via a pulley. The inquiry focuses on determining the mass of the hanging block under two conditions: when both blocks are at rest and when they are moving at constant velocity. The coefficient of static friction for the inclined block is given as 0.2.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on both blocks, including gravitational and frictional forces. There are attempts to calculate the tension in the rope and the mass of the hanging block based on different scenarios.
  • Some participants question the role of static versus kinetic friction in the calculations, particularly in the context of the blocks being at rest versus in motion.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of friction on the mass calculation for the hanging block, with some suggesting that the problem lacks clarity regarding the coefficients of friction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the problem. Some have provided calculations and reasoning, while others are questioning the assumptions made, particularly regarding the coefficients of friction and their impact on the results. There is no explicit consensus yet on the correct approach or final values.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not specify the coefficient of kinetic friction for the constant velocity case, leading to uncertainty in the calculations. There is also mention of the need to consider the effects of friction more thoroughly in the context of the problem.

stumper
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2kg block (m1) resting on a plane inclined 37 degrees is connected by a rope through a pulley to a block (m2) hanging free. The coefficient of static friction on m1 is 0.2. What is the mass of m2 if both masses are at rest? How about if both masses are moving at constant velocity?


Homework Equations


For m1:
F=mg
F=mgcosӨ
F=mgsinӨ
N=-mgcosӨ

For m2:
T=mg

The Attempt at a Solution


For m1:
F=mg=(2kg)(9.81m/s/s)=19.62N
F=mgcosӨ=19.62N(cos37)=15.66N
F=mgsinӨ=19.62N(sin37)=11.81N
N=-11.81N

F=T-mgsinӨ=0, therefore T=mgsinӨ=11.81N

Since mu=0.2, Fs=mu(N)=(0.2)(15.66N)=3.13N, therefore since Fs is less than T, the system will continue to accelerate upward.

For m2:
F=mg-T=0, therefore T=mg


If both masses are at rest, the sum of y-direction forces on m2 must equal zero, therefore for m2, T-mg=0, thus:

11.81N-m(9.81m/s/s)=0
11.81N/9.81m/s/s = m
m=1.2kg...so in the end, does mu have any affect on the calculation of the mass for m2? Or does it and I've forgotten to calculate something?

Also if both masses are moving at constant velocity (ie: no acceleration), the mass would be same as computed above.


Thanks in advance for any tips.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a component of weight of m1 acting down the incline and there is the friction (static) component.

Usually the coefficient of kinetic friction is less than that of static friction.
 
Last edited:
1.) The static friction force is not always u_s(N). Often, it is less.
2.) The problem should have specified u_k for the constant velocity case. One can only assume that u_s =u_k. Even with that assumption, the results for m2 will not necessarily be the same for the 'at rest' and 'constant velocity' case.
 
PhanthomJay said:
2.) The problem should have specified u_k for the constant velocity case. One can only assume that u_s =u_k. Even with that assumption, the results for m2 will not necessarily be the same for the 'at rest' and 'constant velocity' case.

Sorry for the typo. u_k is 0.2. There is no specified u_s in the given problem. That being said, if f_k=u_k(f_N), where is the best point to incorporate this equation into the given work? It appears 1.2kg would be the mass if the system is frictionless in nature...but friction changes everything.
 
stumper said:
Sorry for the typo. u_k is 0.2. There is no specified u_s in the given problem. That being said, if f_k=u_k(f_N), where is the best point to incorporate this equation into the given work? It appears 1.2kg would be the mass if the system is frictionless in nature...but friction changes everything.
As Astronuc implied, you neglected the friction force in your application of Newton 1 for the constant velocity case. That will give you the solution to m2 for the constant velocity case. For the at rest case, friction is less than or equal to u_s(N), so you'd get a range of values for m2, starting with 1.2 Kg if you did the math correctly, up to some value depending on what u_s(N) is.
 
Taking the advice of PhantomJay and Astronuc, let me redo part of the problem from scratch:

Constant Velocity:


The force pulling m1 downward is mgsinӨ, so
mgsinӨ=(2kg)(9.81m/s/s)(sin37)=11.81N

The frictional force opposing this force is u_k(N) [where N is the Normal force, or in this case, mgcosӨ], so

u_kmgcosӨ=(0.2)(2kg)(9.81m/s/s)(cos37)=3.14N

The weight of m2 is also opposing this force, so
m2=Mg [where M is the mass value for m2]

Since the block is moving with constant velocity the net force is zero, so
11.81N-3.14N-Mg=0
8.67N-9.81M=0
-9.81M=-8.67N
Dividing by -1 eliminates the negative signs on both sides, so
9.81M=8.67N
M=8.67N/9.81
M=0.88kg.

Does that part look right?
 
stumper said:
Taking the advice of PhantomJay and Astronuc, let me redo part of the problem from scratch:

Constant Velocity:


The force pulling m1 downward is mgsinӨ, so
mgsinӨ=(2kg)(9.81m/s/s)(sin37)=11.81N

The frictional force opposing this force is u_k(N) [where N is the Normal force, or in this case, mgcosӨ], so

u_kmgcosӨ=(0.2)(2kg)(9.81m/s/s)(cos37)=3.14N

The weight of m2 is also opposing this force, so
m2=Mg [where M is the mass value for m2]

Since the block is moving with constant velocity the net force is zero, so
11.81N-3.14N-Mg=0
8.67N-9.81M=0
-9.81M=-8.67N
Dividing by -1 eliminates the negative signs on both sides, so
9.81M=8.67N
M=8.67N/9.81
M=0.88kg.

Does that part look right?
That looks right if the block m1 is moving at constant velocity down the plane. Now you must ask what the mass M must be if the block m1 is moving up the plane at constant velocity? And then,what does that tell you if the block m1 is at rest?
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
790
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K