I Calculating Modes in a Cavity: Why Use a Spherical Volume?

Conservation
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
My question stems form the section "How Many Modes in a Cavity?" in the following derivation of Rayleigh-Jean Law:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/rayj.html#c2"

In here, they count the number of modes as represented by volume of an eighth of a sphere. What's the mathematical justification behind using a spherical volume? Also, I understand why they divided by 8 since the n's must be positive, but aren't the n's here also supposed to be integers only?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation said:
My question stems form the section "How Many Modes in a Cavity?" in the following derivation of Rayleigh-Jean Law:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/rayj.html#c2"

In here, they count the number of modes as represented by volume of an eighth of a sphere. What's the mathematical justification behind using a spherical volume? Also, I understand why they divided by 8 since the n's must be positive, but aren't the n's here also supposed to be integers only?
We may be interested in the mode count within a sphere. It may relate to questions like how many modes have energy less that some particular value or other calculations.

There is an error here introduced by pretending like the points have a uniform density when actually there are discrete grid points. It's an approximation. It's possible to make a more accurate expression. You might want to look at the first chapter of https://www.amazon.com/dp/0123821886/?tag=pfamazon01-20if you are interested.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top