Calculating Normal Forces for a Vibrating Beam with Two Impacting Feet

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brazensage
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating normal forces for a vibrating beam with two feet impacting the ground at different accelerations. The researcher is exploring how to divide the total mass of the beam to determine the normal force at each foot. Key considerations include whether the beam behaves as a unit or flexes during vibration, and how the positions of the feet affect the calculations. The relationship between the timing of the impacts and the beam's flexural characteristics is also questioned. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate force calculations in ultrasonic vibration research.
Brazensage
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This has been a bit of a problem for me for a while. My research is in ultrasonic vibrations and this question I have relates to a vibrating beam I am working with. I have a free-free beam vibrating transversely and I know what the accelerations along the beam are. On the beam are feet at two different locations that impact the ground. If there were only one foot impacting the ground I would say that the resulting normal force would simply be:

N=(m_totalbeam)*-(accel_foot)

But since I have two feet how do you divide up the mass? Essentially, if the bar's feet hit the ground with 2 different accelerations, what would each resulting normal force be? Would each foot be 1/2 the total mass times the acceleration of the foot? Would I have to calculate the mass from the foot to the nearest node?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The beam's vibrating in a vertical plane? Is the whole beam moving as a unit or flexing? If flexing, what's the relationship between the instants at which the feet hit the ground (together?). How are the feet positioned as distances from the ends of the bar?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top