Calculating Normal Vector Derivative in Differential Geometry Using Curve Basis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the derivative of the normal vector, denoted as dN, in differential geometry using the curve defined by the parametric equation \(\vec{a}(u,v) = (u,v,uv)\). The partial derivatives \(\vec{a}_{u} = (1, 0, v)\) and \(\vec{a}_{v} = (0, 1, u)\) are established, leading to the normal vector \(\vec{N} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{v^{2}+u^{2}+1}} (-v, -u, 1)\). The user expresses confusion regarding the transition from N to dN and contemplates using the Jacobian matrix for this calculation, indicating a need for clarity on the application of these concepts in deriving the second fundamental forms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric curves in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and their applications
  • Knowledge of normal vectors and their significance in surface theory
  • Basic proficiency in using Jacobian matrices for transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of normal vectors in differential geometry
  • Learn how to compute the Jacobian matrix for parametric surfaces
  • Research the concept of second fundamental forms and their applications
  • Explore examples of calculating derivatives of normal vectors in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying differential geometry, as well as anyone involved in surface modeling and analysis in computer graphics or engineering.

metzky
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using the curve \vec{a}(u,v)= (u,v,uv) for all (u,v) ε R^2

Find the matrix for d\vec{N} in the basis of {\vec{a}_{u},\vec{a}_{v}}

Homework Equations


Well first off i found the partial derivatives
\vec{a}_{u} which is 1,0,v, while \vec{a}_{v} is 0,1,u
Then using those i found the normal vector which i calculated as 1/\sqrt{v^{2}+u^{2}+1} (-v,-u,1)

The Attempt at a Solution

Now this is where i get lost. Our book does not explain this very well at all. It just shows going fron N to dN with no explanation. I tried using the jacobian matrix to calculate the derivative but I'm not sure if this is the right approach. Most of the examples don't have a matrix from so i Know I'm doing something wrong.

The problem is a set from
kbw0RwT.png
for reference. I need dN to move on to find the second fundamental forms and so forth
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually could i bring out the 1/sq u^2... out of the jacobian matrix then use the matrix to find the vector or no? so only the -v,-u,1 would be getting partially derived in the matrix?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K