Calculating Orbital Period of Satellites

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the orbital period of a satellite using the radius of its orbit and the mass of the central object, the key equation is T^2 = (2π)²r³/GM. This formula derives from equating gravitational force and centripetal force, where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the central object, and r is the orbital radius. The small mass of the satellite can be neglected in this calculation. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between gravitational and centripetal forces in determining orbital dynamics. Understanding this equation is crucial for accurately predicting satellite motion.
Bugsy23
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
How do you calculate the orbital period of an object, eg. a satellite, if the only known values are the radius of the orbit and the mass of the central object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equations that come to mind are a = 1/r v2 = wr = 2(pi)r/T and mw2r =Mw2R (the two centripetal forces are equal)...M is the big mass, like the Earth with circular radius orbit R..

if the gravitalional force equals the centripetal...F = ma.. so
GMm/(R+r)2 = mw2r and the small m's drop out...

Then just assume R (radius of orbit of the big central mass) is negligible...
and you are right near the answer...
 
it comes out to be:

T^2= ((2*pi)^2*r^3)/GM

where r is radius and M is mass of central object. T is time period
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top