Calculating Potential from Charge Density via Poisson Equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
corroded_b
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm doing MD-simulations in a capacitor-like system: 2 charged electrodes with a dense ionic liquid in between (non-diluted) with periodic boundaries in 2 dimensions (so for the electrodes I get infinite planes (xy) ,charged).

I want to get the potential [itex]U(z)[/itex] along the z-axis (witch is perpendicular to the electrodes). This is the superposition of the linear electrode pot. and the potential contribution of the ions.

So I calculate the charge density [itex]\rho(z)[/itex] and use the poisson equation [itex]\nabla^2\Psi=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon}[/itex] to get the potential.

Now, in the http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/jp803440q/suppl_file/jp803440q_si_002.pdf" (page 3 on top) this potential (in gaussian units) is written as [itex]\Psi(z)=-\frac{4 \pi}{\epsilon^*} \int_0^z (z-z') \rho(z')dz'[/itex]. Can someone explain/proof this expression?

Thanks,
corro
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Ok, got think I got it now:

I calculated the charge density [itex]\rho(z)[/itex] by splitting the system in infinite sheets (or boxes in practical numerics). The surface charge on sheet [itex]n[/itex] is [itex]\sigma_n[/itex].

One sheet at position [itex]z_n[/itex] gives me the potential [itex]\Psi(z)=-\frac{4 \pi}{\epsilon^*}\sigma_n (z-z_n)[/itex].

For a continuous charge density I get the integral expression [itex]\Psi(z)=-\frac{4 \pi}{\epsilon^*} \int_0^z \rho(z') (z-z') dz'[/itex].

Correct?
 


I think you certainly can do it this way, by the linearity of the electric field contributed by each layer of charge of sheet density [itex]\sigma[/itex]n(zn)=[itex]\rho[/itex](z)dz, and then sum up (integrated with respect to z) the contribution to the potential of all layer of [itex]\rho[/itex](z)dz from 0 to z.

The mathematical formality is as followed, but it is equivalent to the method you employed (if I understood you correctly as stated above), starting with Gauss's law over unit area Gaussian column extending from electrode at 0 to z,

-[itex]\epsilon[/itex][itex]\nabla[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]=[itex]\int^{z}_{0}[/itex][itex]\rho[/itex](z[itex]^{'}[/itex])dz[itex]^{'}[/itex]
[itex]\Rightarrow[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{z}_{0}[/itex][itex]\nabla\psi[/itex]dz[itex]^{'}[/itex]=-[itex]\frac{1}{\epsilon}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{z}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{z^{'}}_{0}[/itex][itex]\rho[/itex](z[itex]^{''}[/itex])dz[itex]^{''}[/itex]dz[itex]^{'}[/itex]
[itex]\Rightarrow[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{z}_{0}[/itex]d[itex]\psi[/itex]=-[itex]\frac{1}{\epsilon}[/itex]{z[itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{z}_{0}[/itex][itex]\rho[/itex](z[itex]^{'}[/itex])dz[itex]^{'}[/itex]-[itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{z}_{0}[/itex]z[itex]^{'}[/itex][itex]\rho[/itex](z[itex]^{'}[/itex])dz[itex]^{'}[/itex]}
[itex]\Rightarrow[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex](z)=-[itex]\frac{1}{\epsilon}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{z}_{0}[/itex](z-z[itex]^{'}[/itex])[itex]\rho[/itex](z[itex]^{'}[/itex])dz[itex]^{'}[/itex]

Note : Integrate by parts the right hand side of 2nd eqn to arrive at the 3rd eqn.
 
Last edited: