Calculating Relativistic Rocket Performance

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter trilex1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativistic Rockets
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
trilex1
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello there

I've been looking at this page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_rocket

at the relativistic version of Tsiolkovsky rocket equation, but something puzzles me


With chemical rockets, the mass that is being converted into energy is so tiny that almost
all fuel mass can be considered to end up as propellant, but when we are talking about relativistic speeds, the energy requirements are so high that a major portion of fuel would end up being converted to energy.

What puzzles me is how to incorporate this into this equation.

For example, if 80% of the rocket mass was fuel, and there was, say a fusion process, and the product was propellant with kinetic energy equal to matter that was converted into energy how would you incorporate this into the equation? Because now, not all of the fuel mass is propellant, and yet there was indeed a loss in ships mass (which was converted into kinetic energy)
Any ideas?

Perhaps my assumptions about the equation are wrong.
I assumed that the mass ratios are just reaction mass vs. total mass, and have nothing to do with that portion of mass that is converted into energy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now this is embarrassing

I did actually read the whole page, and entered everything into matlab, to get some nice curves out, and then started getting strange results, actually I was getting out complex numbers, lol, so I thought maybe I didn't understand the equation right, which is why I started this thread.

Either way, it works fine now after I double checked it

thanks

I hope this thread doesn't end up as useless
 
But just so this thread doesn't go to waste, I'm going to ask, this this equation still hold if your "exhaust" is in form of radiation?
In other words, can a self-fueled laser be a classical rocket.
I know radiation has momentum, but I'm just wondering if there is a catch
 
The specific impulse of a photon / laser exhaust is 1 in geometric (relativistic) units. In meters/second, it's just 'c'. You might also see this as 3*10^8 netwon seconds / kg.

Sometimes you see specific impulse in seconds as the Wikipedia article mentions, you have to multiply the figure in seconds by the acceleration of gravity in m/s^2, i.e by 9.8 m/s^2, to convert this to the correct units of velocity. Thus the specific impulse of a photon drive would be about 30 million seconds (354 days, about 1 year).