MHB Calculating Retail Price Based On Gross Profit Margin Percentage with commission

  • Thread starter Thread starter sealsseals
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Margin
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the retail price based on a desired gross profit margin percentage, one must account for both the cost of the product and the commission percentage. The formula to determine the retail price is r = c / (1 - k - m), where c is the total cost, k is the commission percentage, and m is the desired margin percentage. For example, with a cost of $130, a 20% commission, and a 15% margin, the retail price would be $200. This ensures that after deducting the cost and commission, the desired profit margin is achieved. Understanding this calculation is essential for setting appropriate retail prices.
sealsseals
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

How do I calculate the retail price for the following scenario:

Retail price less a 20% commission less the cost of the product = a 15% gross profit margin (Gross profit margin percentage = (retail price - total cost (20% off of retail and cost of product)) / retail price

I know what the cost of the product is ($10.00) and I know the gross profit margin % I want to make is (15%) and I know what the commission percentage off of retail will be (20%), how do calculate what the retail price should be to achieve desired gross profit margin %?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Outch...the wording of your problem makes my head spin :)

Here's what I understand it is; example:
Cost of widget: 100

Customer Joe pays : 150
Jack the Salesman gets: 30 (20% of 150)

Left for you is 150 - 30 = 20 : that's 20% of the cost.

How did I do?!
 
Thank you for the reply. Partially correct.

First you must understand gross profit margin % in the context of this question which is retail price-cost/retail price, for example if the retail price is 15.00 and the cost is 5.00 then the gross profit margin % is 15-5/15=66%, this means that 66% of the retail price is profit, 15*66%=10.00, this is correct because 15 retail minus 5.00 cost equals 10.00, 10.00 is the gross margin profit in dollars (not %).

I'm trying to figure out how to calculate what the retail price should be to earn 15% gross profit margin when my cost in the above example is the cost of the product AND a 20% commission of the retail price. I will always know the gross profit margin % I want to make, and the cost of the product and the % of commission off retail, I just now need to know how to calculate what the retail price should be. Make sense?
 
sealsseals said:
...which is retail price-cost/retail price, for example if the retail price is 15.00 and the cost is 5.00 then the gross profit margin % is 15-5/15=66%,...
Above should be: (retail price - cost)/retail price and (15 - 5)/15.
Brackets are required; else 15 - 5/15 = 14.66.

FORMULA: r = c / (1 - k - m)

Example:
cost = c (130)
commission = k (.20)
margin = m (.15)
retail = r (?)

r = 130 / (1 - .20 - .15) = 200

+200 (retail)
-130 (cost)
-040 (commission)
------
+30 (margin)

Hokay Dokay?
 
Brilliant! Thank you very much for your help, exactly what I needed!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top