Calculating Soot Deposition in a Circular Pattern

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the amount of soot deposited by a garbage incinerator, which spreads in a circular pattern. The depth of soot at a distance from the incinerator is described by a given function, and the task is to set up a definite integral for the soot deposited within a specified radius.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration process and the necessity of unit conversion when multiplying the depth function by the area element. Questions arise about the correctness of the book's approach and whether the integral yields a valid volume without conversion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the unit conversion issue and the integration process. Some express confusion about the relationship between the units involved, while others suggest that the book may have implicitly handled unit conversions.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the units of measurement for depth and distance, as well as the implications of these units on the final volume calculation. Participants are questioning the assumptions made in the problem setup and the validity of the provided solution approach.

1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



The soot produced by a garbage incinerator spreads out in a circular pattern. The depth H(r) in millimeters, of the soot deposited each month at distance r kilometers from the incinerator is given by H(r) = 0.115e^(-2r)

Write the definite integral for the amount of soot deposited per month in a 5 kilometer radius.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Looks easy, but something is confusing me.

I integrate from 0 to 5 kilometers and multiply H(r) by 2pir, but since these functions give out different units, one in millimeters and one in kilometers, how can I just straight multiply? I divided H(r) by 10e^6 to put the millimeters into kilometers, but the book doesn't do that. The book just multiplies the two functions and integrates from 0 to 5.

Why is no unit conversion nessesary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to convert the units. Your book might be wrong. Are you sure it didn't multiply/divide a unit conversion factor in there somewhere you didn't notice?
 
I am sure. If I ran their integral as is, would I get a correct volume in cubic meters, or just a nonsense result?
 
noo you don't have to convert the units. H(r) is in millimetres and r is in kilometres. The equation already takes into account that r is in km, and spits out an answer in mm.
 
What? But I have to multiply that by the area, 2pir, which is surely in kilometers..
 
Oh I'm sorry I think I've misunderstood what's going on. Let me know if this is right: H(r)dr will give you the depth of the soot at each r value along a radius. you want to get the volume of this soot so you multiply the H(r)dr by 2pir, but you're pretty sure that there has to be a unit conversion. It sounds to me like you're right.

EDIT: oooo they give you an answer in cubic metres? Sounds to me like they did a little unit conversion under your nose. If they did km * mm, they might not do a unit conversion because km/1000 = metres and mm*1000 = metres. So they might have just skipped it and settled on metres.
 
No, they gave me nothing. I am asking if evaluating their integral that has no conversion will give a correct volume in cubic meters, since one unit is 1000 times smaller, and one is 1000 times bigger.
 
ohh that's a question? Well this is confusing.
 
I feel like you need two integrals for this problem. I think that you need one to integrate across the radius to find depth. And the second integral to find the volume of that slice rotated 360 degrees.
 
  • #10
No..
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K