Calculating Spherical Collision Outcomes

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating spherical collision outcomes, the focus is on an elastic collision between two spherical masses, m1 and m2, with specific velocities and directions. To determine the new direction of m1 post-collision, one must apply conservation of energy and momentum principles, resulting in three equations to solve for the unknowns. The conversation also touches on how changes in m1's velocity or surface friction could affect its deflection angle, indicating that friction may introduce rotational effects. Additionally, the applicability of this collision model to calculate an aircraft's deflection angle due to crosswinds is questioned, with the consensus being that the complexities of fluid dynamics make it less suitable. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of foundational physics principles in analyzing collisions and their broader implications.
Badmachine
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
A spherical mass (m1 at 4 kilograms), moving at 10m/s from the northwest (or from the direction of 315 degrees), collides with another spherical mass (m2 at 2 kilograms), moving at 5m/s from the south (or from the direction of 180 degrees).

Mass m2 is now redirected toward the southwest (or towards the direction of 225 degress).

How would one calculate for the new direction of m1?

Thank you.

P.S.: Not homework.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming the collision is elastic, so kinetic energy is conserved...

You set up equations for conservation of energy, conservation of x-component of momentum, and conservation of y-component of momentum. This gives you three equations which you can solve for the three unknowns: speed of m1, speed of m2, and direction of m2.

Even though this may not be an actual homework question, it is a homework-like question, and therefore belongs in the homework forums (and has been moved there.)
 
Thanks JTB.

Two other questions if I may:

- Would a change in velocity of m1 or surface friction coefficients of m1 and m2, result in a deflection angle change for m1?

- Could this same model be used to calculate an aircraft deflection angle created by a crosswind, if aircraft speed, air density and air velocity are known? (ordinary "wind triangle" calculations don't seem to account for this question when different speeds are applied)

E.g.: an aircraft would become m1 (same direction) and a crosswind would become m2 (same direction).
 
Last edited:
OK, I thought you wanted to work out the solution for that particular situation, which is why I moved this originally to the homework forums. Simple collisions like the one you described are pretty common homework exercises in introductory physics courses. Now it appears you want to discuss this more generally, so I've moved it back to the original forum. Sorry for the confusion.

Badmachine said:
- Would a change in velocity of m1 or surface friction coefficients of m1 and m2, result in a deflection angle change for m1?

A change in v1 would make a difference, in general.

Friction between m1 and m2 would in general cause both spheres to start rotating (if they weren't rotating to begin with) or change their state of rotation. If their rotational kinetic energy is significant (compared to their translational kinetic energy) you'd have to take that into account in energy conservation. I've never tried to solve a problem like that myself.

- Could this same model be used to calculate an aircraft deflection angle created by a crosswind, if aircraft speed, air density and air velocity are known? (ordinary "wind triangle" calculations don't seem to account for this question when different speeds are applied)

I doubt this would work very well. This sounds like a rather complex aerodynamic problem. You've got bazillions of air molecules (not a single rigid object) colliding with the plane and with each other. The motions of the molecules are affected by the motions of the other molecules (fluid flow).
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top