Calculating Stopping Force for an Object in Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter KelseyG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the stopping force for a 20,000 lb object moving at 5 ft/s that stops instantly, it's important to recognize that an instantaneous stop would theoretically require infinite force. Instead, a more realistic approach involves estimating the deceleration over a short distance, such as a 1/4" divot created upon impact. Assuming constant deceleration, the object would decelerate from 5 ft/s to 0 ft/s in approximately 1/120 seconds, resulting in an acceleration of 600 ft/s². Using the formula F=ma, the force can be calculated based on the object's mass and the derived acceleration. Ultimately, the stopping force varies significantly depending on the stopping distance and the surface characteristics.
KelseyG
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me? I'm pulling my hair out on a simple problem that I should know by heart.

I have an object in downward motion that weighs 20,000 lbs moving at a constant velocity of 5 ft/s. It contacts a solid object (say the ground) and is stopped instantly. What force was exerted to stop the object?

Thanks,
Kelsey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Force is the rate of change of momentum with respect to time. If the object stops instantly, you are going to have some problems.
 
KelseyG said:
and is stopped instantly
The ball stopped in zero time, meaning the force is infinite.
 
KelseyG said:
I have an object in downward motion that weighs 20,000 lbs moving at a constant velocity of 5 ft/s. It contacts a solid object (say the ground) and is stopped instantly.
As the previous posts point out, the object didn't really stop instantly - that would require an infinite force. But we can estimate the actual forces involved. For example:

Let's say the object makes a divot 1/4" deep in the surface of the earth. That means the speed object went from 5 ft/sec to 0 ft/sec as it moved 1/4" from the point where the surface of the Earth was to where it ended up. Assuming constant deceleration (an approximation that simplifies the calculation no end) the object moved through that distance at an average speed of 2.5 ft/sec or 30 in/sec. Thus, it covered that distance in 1/120 seconds (1/4" at 30 in/sec). Its speed went from 5 ft/sec to 0 ft/sec in 1/120 seconds, so the acceleration was 600 ft/sec^2.

Now we can use F=ma to calculate the force needed to produce that acceleration. Just remember that if the object weighs 20000 lbs its mass is 20000/32 slugs. However, I'm done doing arithmetic in my head for this problem... There's a reason why scientists and engineers use the metric system these days :)
 
Well, sadly to say, I'm an engineer for forgot this stuff, lol. Thanks for the input. It makes me feel better about it knowing that it's not that simple and that I don't have all the variables I need in order to solve my situation.
 
KelseyG said:
Well, sadly to say, I'm an engineer for forgot this stuff, lol. Thanks for the input. It makes me feel better about it knowing that it's not that simple and that I don't have all the variables I need in order to solve my situation.

The basic principle is that the more abruptly the object is stopped (the shallower the divot in the earth, the less distance it travels as it decelerates) the greater the force. That's why a glass will break if you drop it on a concrete floor but not if you drop it onto a mattress.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
There are several things here that need to be addressed... 1) how far did it drop ? 2) There is no way that anyone can comment on the crater impact
component without knowing what state the surface is in... clay, cement, dirt that hasn't seen water for years... At best F = ma
9090.9 Kg x 1.52 m/s squared =13,818.16 N = Kg x m/s squared...
 
Back
Top