Calculating Surfaces of Intersecting Cylinders

  • Thread starter Thread starter agent_cooper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinders
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the surface area of the region common to the intersecting cylinders defined by the equations x² + y² = 1 and x² + z² = 1. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the parametrization of the surfaces and the reasoning behind a specific numerical answer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the algebraic conditions defining the intersection of the cylinders and explore geometric insights. There are attempts to formulate the surface area using integrals, with questions about the need for specific multipliers in the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and prompting further exploration of the geometry involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to show work and consider the geometry of the problem, but no consensus has been reached on the solution or approach.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need for the original poster to demonstrate their work to facilitate more effective assistance. The discussion also touches on the potential complexity of the integrals involved and the geometric interpretation of the cylinders.

agent_cooper
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

Find the surface area of the region common to the intersecting cylinders
x^2 + y^2 = 1 and x^2 + z^2 = 1.

2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution

I know that the answer is 16 but why? How can we parametrize this surfaces?





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF, agent_cooper. You need to show us your work in order for us to offer tutorial help. What integrals are the relevant equations for calculating the surface area of shapes with boundaries? How do those equations apply here?
 
Have you tried actually thinking about the algebraic conditions that define the intersection of those two cylinders? As in your last post you may want to think about how understanding the geometry can help you to avoid an explicit integral.
 
We can solve these equations together for z and x(we need two parameters):
z = y or z = -y & x = sqrt(1 - y^2) or x = -sqrt(1 - y^2) . The surface area can be formulized as (integral) z ds.
Here ds = sqrt (1 + (dx/dy)^2) dy. Since (dx/dy)^2 = (y^2) / (1 - y^2), we get ds = 1 / sqrt(1 - y^2). We have z = y , and thus we get
S = (integral from 0 to r) [y / (1 - y^2)] dy . We can solve it by using an appropriate substitution(and the value of this integral is 1 actually).
My question is why we multiply this integral by 16? Maybe it's easy but i can't see it for now.
 
I like z=+/-y. The cylinders are cut by planes. That's the geometric insight. I really don't get the rest of your post, but the it's late here and I'm tired. Cylinders are fundamentally flat. You can unwrap the surface sections onto a plane and solve them there.
 
Anyway, thanks. It's such a good site and later i want to contribute,too.
 
agent_cooper said:
Anyway, thanks. It's such a good site and later i want to contribute,too.

It is a good site, innit it? Thank the moderators for keeping it sane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K