Calculating Tension in a Wire with a Perched Bird: A Physics Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in a wire when a 1.50 kg bird lands on it, causing a sag of 0.190 m between two telephone poles spaced 46.0 m apart. The tension is not purely horizontal due to the sag, requiring the resolution of forces into components. Participants emphasize using trigonometry to determine the angle of inclination and applying Newton's second law to establish equilibrium conditions for the forces acting on the bird. The correct approach involves calculating the tension using the formula T = 14.7 N / Sin(θ), where θ is the angle of inclination derived from the geometry of the situation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Basic trigonometry for resolving forces into components
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams
  • Familiarity with the concept of static equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to draw and analyze free body diagrams for static systems
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in physics
  • Explore trigonometric functions and their applications in force resolution
  • Investigate tension calculations in various physical scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of tension and force resolution in real-world applications.

hm8
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The distance between two telephone poles is 46.0 m. When a 1.50 kg bird lands on the telephone wire midway between the poles, the wire sags 0.190 m.

How much tension does the bird produce in the wire? Ignore the weight of the wire.

Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I really just don't know where to start with this one...its confusing to me since the force of the bird (1.5 kg*9.8m/s2 = 14.7 N) is vertical, but the tension is sideways...so for F=ma, would I be looking at the sum of the forces in the x or y direction? Or is there some way to simplify it to one dimension?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So the question is find the tension in the cable?
 
The tension is not entirely horizontal, because the rope sags. You'll have to resolve the forces into components. In reality, the rope would probably curve, but for simplicity, why don't you assume that the rope has two straight, sloping sections that meet at the midpoint (where the bird is sitting), to form a sort of "V" shape. The vertical position of the midpoint (bottom of the "V") is 0.190 m below where it was when the bird was absent and the rope was horizontal.

Does that help?
 
Gah, somehow forgot to put the question in. Sorry.

How much tension does the bird produce in the wire? Ignore the weight of the wire.
 
Hello hm8.If by sideways you mean horizontal that's not exactly true.The wire sags so the wire on each side of the bird is inclined upwards at an angle to the horizontal.Start by sketching a diagram and marking in the forces at the point where the bird is.You will have the weight of the bird acting down and the tension in each side of the wire acting along the line of the wire.
 
cepheid said:
The tension is not entirely horizontal, because the rope sags. You'll have to resolve the forces into components. In reality, the rope would probably curve, but for simplicity, why don't you assume that the rope has two straight, sloping sections that meet at the midpoint (where the bird is sitting), to form a sort of "V" shape. The vertical position of the midpoint (bottom of the "V") is 0.190 m below where it was when the bird was absent and the rope was horizontal.

Does that help?

Okay...so the downward component of the tension force is 14.7 N?

Still not sure where to go from there...how do I use the length of the wire and the amount it sags? I guess I can figure out that the length of one half of this 'V' is 23.0007 m (square root of .192 + (46/2)2), but does that help me?
 
hm8 said:
Okay...so the downward component of the tension force is 14.7 N?

No, because tension always acts in the "along the length of the rope" direction. Dadface has given you good advice when it comes to actually implementing what I suggested.

Edit: okay maybe it's not so clear from his post as I thought. Use what you know of the geometry of the situation to figure out by what angle each half of the rope is inclined (relative to the horizontal). Then use that angle, and basic trigonometry, to resolve the tension force into horizontal and vertical components. Then use Newton's second law to figure out what conditions on those components must be true in order for the situation to be static (i.e. sums of forces in x and y directions are *each* equal to zero) .
 
cepheid said:
No, because tension always acts in the "along the length of the rope" direction. Dadface has given you good advice when it comes to actually implementing what I suggested.

Edit: okay maybe it's not so clear from his post as I thought. Use what you know of the geometry of the situation to figure out by what angle each half of the rope is inclined (relative to the horizontal). Then use that angle, and basic trigonometry, to resolve the tension force into horizontal and vertical components. Then use Newton's second law to figure out what conditions on those components must be true in order for the situation to be static (i.e. sums of forces in x and y directions are *each* equal to zero) .

Okay, so the rope is inclined at and angle of 0.00826 degrees above the horizontal.

So the components of the tension vector would just be Cos(0.008)T and Sin(0.008)T

So, in the Y direction...

F = ma
-mg + Sin(0.008)T = 0
-14.7 N + Sin(0.008)T = 0
T= 14.7 N/Sin(0.008)

...is that right so far? Or does the force of gravity on the bird not fit in there?

EDIT:
Sorry, make that .4733 degrees for the angle, my calculator was in radians mode.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The method looks right with a few minor issues. Draw a free body diagram for the bird. What forces act on it? In particular, how many forces act on it due to the rope? What I'm hinting at is, are you sure that there should be only one Tsin(theta) term?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K